this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
20 points (88.5% liked)

Asklemmy

47426 readers
1241 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Cars > public transportation. I forget things & often have to turn back, and I like the freedom to change my mind at any point, stop where I want, and go wherever I want. I also hate being forced into shared public spaces. I also hate the idea of trusting the government to make any of it in any way near efficient. Fuck public transportation.

[–] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Vegans oppose animal cruelty.

Vegetarians don't, as the production of eggs, milk, etc is cruel.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Pitbulls are not more genetically predisposed towards biting or mauling than other breeds and the supposed "statistical data" on the subject is based around a confluence of inaccurate metrics caused by 1) people not being very good at accurately identifying dog breeds, 2) existing groups that hate pitbulls pushing bad statistics for political purposes, and 3) a self-fulfilling prophecy of pitbulls having a bad reputation and actively being sought out by people who want vicious dogs and who will treat their dogs in such a way as to encourage that behavior. And I say all of this as someone who does not own a pitbull and probably never will.

[–] jozep@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On a tangent, I've seen many pitbulls breathing heavily. Is this normal for these dogs? Are other dogs races like this?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So I think your 3rd point is highly likely, but I do disagree about the genetic predisposition. If it can’t be genetically influenced then goldens are not more friendly than others, and smart dogs (poodles, Australian shepherd, etc.) are not actually smarter; they all have the same genetic predisposition.

Having an aggressive breed is possible, but as I said earlier I think the 3rd point pushes up the numbers of maulings quite a bit. I’d add a 4th point of a lot of people being real shit dog owners and not knowing how to properly raise a dog to be socially capable without harming others.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All DST and time zones should be removed and we should only have one global time. People in different locations would just get up at different times on the clock. Communication about times would get so much easier, communication about schedules would get so much easier. "The same time every week" would have an actual meaning all year around regardless of any notions about getting up later relative to local sunrise in the darker time of the year.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

This solves making the statement "let's meet at 5" be more clear globally, but doesn't solve the actual confusion. Person A getting up hours before normal, being in the middle of person B's day, and being when person C would go to bed still happens. All it does is destroy any frame of reference and make travel more difficult. You would still need a chart to know if any time was actually during waking or business hours at each location on earth.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Any comment that gets more than one upvote fails the subject.

[–] LifeOfChance@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I disagree. Lemmy is a very small group of individuals and these type of threads are going to have similar minded people finding eachother. In the grand scheme of things we are next to nothing in scale of the billions of people on this planet.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I gave your comment its second upvote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xariphon@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Young people are people and deserving of rights, including but not limited to the vote. There is no stupid thing a young person could do with their vote that old people don't already do and we don't require them not to in order to keep their vote.

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When I was mid 20s I thought young kids were too naive. I got older and saw how fucking stupid most adults are and think young kids are much smarter than their predecessors. They should absolutely have a voice in elections. 16 seems like a good age to me

load more comments (2 replies)

Hell yeah! People say that kids and teens don't have enough life experience to make decisions, but also it's really difficult to gain life experience when you're constantly shielded from everything.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yep. I'd say 12 is a good age to start, because most will be able to read and understand government.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Hundun@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We learn and teach inferior personal computing practice, and most people don't realize how much they are missing.

The vast majority of people outside of enthusiast circles have absolutely no idea what a personal computer is, how it works, what is an operating system, what it does, and how it is supposed to be used. Instead of teaching about shells, sessions, environments, file systems, protocols, standards and Unix philosophy (things that actually make our digital world spin) we teach narrow systems of proprietary walled gardens.

This makes powerful personal computing seem mysterious and intimidating to regular people, so they keep opting out of open infrastructures, preferring everything to come pre-made and pre-configured for them by an exploitative corporation. This lack of education is precisely what makes us so vulnerable to tech hype cycles, software and hardware obsolescence, or just plain shitty products that would have no right to exist in a better world.

This blindness and apathy makes our computing more inaccessible and less sustainable, and it makes us crave things that don't actually deserve our collective attention.

And the most frustrating thing is: proper personal computing is actually not that hard, and it has never been more easy to get into, but no one cares, because getting milked for data is just too convenient for most adults.

[–] anothermember@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Completely agree. Now my hot take for this thread:

If governments some time in the 90s had decided from the start to ban computer hardware from being sold with pre-installed software then we wouldn't have this problem. If everyone had to install their own operating system from scratch, which like you say isn't hard if it's taught, it would have killed the mystery around computing and people would feel ownership over their computers and computing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

health insurance != healthcare

health insurance profits only exist at the expense of human suffering.

but lets make sure everyone has insurance but not care

[–] dillydogg@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought this thread was for hot takes πŸ˜‰

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Is this your first time in an "unpopular opinion" thread? lol

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments