this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
24 points (90.0% liked)

Asklemmy

48481 readers
679 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Religions are mostly just popularized conspiracy theories. Believing in God is about as realistic as believing the world is flat.

[–] polysexualstick@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (6 children)

But it's not about that for many people. For many people, being religious is more about finding strength and peace in that kind of guided spirituality

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Monogamy feels like an archaic social convention enforced by unhealthy possessive behaviors and jealousy

[–] Xavier@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

Copyright should have stayed the original initial 14 years with possible renewal to 28 years. But like in France back then, also include the original authors (last one alive, if several) lifespan. Hence, a copyright would last either the authors lifespans or 28 years, whichever is longer.

Moreover, the patent system is being abused and does not serve the original goal of "any useful art, manufacture, engine, machine, or device, or any improvement there on not before known or used." It granted the applicant the "sole and exclusive right and liberty of making, constructing, using and vending to others to be used" of his invention.. It needs major changes, including the requirement to have the "invention" be under examination by reputable third-party laboratories (such as Intertek, SGI, Underwriters Laboratories, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Technischer Überwachungsverein, SGS - Société Générale de Surveillance, etc…) before being granted a patent. Nowadays, patents are given almost willy-nilly to anyone no matter how vague or obvious the supposed invention.

Nowadays, patents are being misused in Patent Ambush mechanisms and scenarios, meanwhile Patent Trolls and Hoarders whole existence is are to impede/obstruct legally and impose exorbitant levies/fees onto organization and companies actually innovating and developing useful art/process/devices. Even more incredible, there are Submarine Patents being hidden away to suddenly take hostage existing products and process of various companies by imposing extortionate royalties.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 2 points 2 years ago

Less than 50% of the opinions in this thread are in any way unpopular.

There. There's my opinion.

[–] kaputt@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago

US Senators and congressmen are underpaid. Their salaries should be doubled. The president should make at least a $1 million a year, directly paid by taxpayers.

Reason: If I, the taxpayer, pay them, then they have to work for me. The payment makes that service relationship explicit. I pay you, you work for me. And, yes, the current pay is too little, $174,000 - barely comparable to tech workers.

Only taking $1 is an invitation for corruption. (Not claiming it happened, but it is an invitation.)

[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

TikTok and YouTube shorts are brain-rotting garbage, and if you use them regularly you need to stop now. Yes, even if you claim you only watch educational stuff.

Also giving a child under the age of 8 or 9 a personal internet-connected device should be seen on a similar level as neglect if not full-on abuse.

[–] Kushia@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What we're currently calling AI isn't AI but just a language processing system that takes its best guess at a response from it's database of information they pilfered from the internet like a more sophisticated Google.

It can't really think for itself and it's answers can be completely wrong. There's nothing intelligent about it.

[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

This whole open AI has Artificial General Intelligence but they're keeping it secret! is like saying Microsoft had Chat GPT 20 years ago with Clippy.

Humans don't even know what intelligence is, the thing we invented to try to measure who's got the best brains - we literally don't even have scientific definition of the word, much less the ability to test it - so we definitely can't program it. We are a veeeeerry long way from even understanding how thoughts and memories work; and the thing we're calling "general intelligence" ? We have no fucking idea what that even means; there's no way a bunch of computer scientists can feed enough Internet to a ML algorithm to "invent" it. (No shade, those peepos are smart - but understanding wtf intelligence is isn't going to come from them.)

One caveat tho: while I don't think we're close to AGI, I do think we're very close to being able to fake it. Going from Chat GPT to something that we can pretend is actual AI is really just a matter of whether we, as humans, are willing to believe it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eightpix@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Lilo and Stitch is the best Disney movie.

Many, many spoilers below. But, seriously, this movie is 21 years old. Get over yourselves.

Check it: a young girl adopts an illegal alien (killing machine from deep space) and protects him from the U.S. (and galactic) government (Military-Industrial complexes), while keeping her incredibly depressed sister (slices both ways) from giving up completely as they keep their Indigenous Hawaiian family together in their co-opted homeland. One sister works a series of dead-end tourism jobs; the other has anger issues. The hate each other and love each other fiercely, though they are about 12 years apart in age.

Oh, yeah, and their parents are dead.

Meanwhile, the alien is a political refugee and freedom fighter fleeing from his own people who want him dead for —get this— existing. A lab-grown, indestructible terrorist, he seeks asylum on an island — but he can't swim.

He does learn to surf.

The only downside to this film is that Disney produced it. And Elvis.

"Ohana means family. Nobody gets left behind or forgotten."

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Huh. I think I need to watch this.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lilo being strangely obsessed with Elvis is actually period accurate.

The movie seems to be set sometime in the very late '80s to the mid to late '90s. There aren't any cell phones, except the ones that the government agents have. The TV is a black and white TV which could indicate either the late '80s or the fact that they are extremely poor in the mid to late '90s. None of the vehicles really give anything away as they all seem to be modeled on '50s to early '80s models of cars. The technology that is actually depicted in the film definitely places it at the end of the '80s, as the earliest it could have possibly happened, and probably the mid to late '90s as a more probable timeline.

There were a lot of people obsessed with "The King" at that time, even fairly young (like 5-7 year old) fans. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that Elvis's music is generally more popular amongst certain kids and tweens from 1956 until the late '90s.

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 1 points 2 years ago

Point of further support: Hawaiians have a weird (to us haoles) love of Las Vegas, going as far as to call it "the Ninth Island". I mean, if you live on a tropical paradise, where are you supposed to go for vacation?

And Elvis is (or at least has a rep as being) super popular and iconic in Vegas. I could definitely see some of that influence back flowing from the Ninth Island back to Hawaii.

[–] UnfortunateDoorHinge@aussie.zone 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Teachers should be paid 50% more. If you want good teachers to stay, you have to walk the walk, otherwise you'll get a perpetual cycle of overwhelmed grads being bossed around by rusted-on bottom teer heads.

[–] worldsayshi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That is hardly an unpopular opinion.

[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If I can interject - I don't think the OP is showing an unpopular opinion. The people they're talking to aren't mad. It looks to me like an opinion whose wisdom isn't generally accepted - and there's a difference.

Unpopular opinion: pedophilia is a mental disorder; child rape (including "statutory" rape) is an act of violence, cruelty, and power - or, in arguably the worst case, crimes of opportunity. Not all child rapists are pedophiles and not all pedophiles are child rapists. Pedophiles should be treated; child rapists should be imprisoned forever. (Those that are in the overlap can be treated in prison.)

This opinion is (I think) probably true, but if you go around talking about it, you will be unpopular.

Unaccepted opinion: well, there are a lot of them here, but this one - about teachers - could be tweaked into one: the only way we are going to see changes that would actually benefit our society and country, the things the news and politicians say are "luxury expenses" - aka health care, teachers' salaries, rent and real estate regulation, etc - is with a general strike. The propaganda and gaslighting and victim blaming are so deeply entrenched that they have become the most profitable sectors of our economy.

This opinion is - again, in my opinion - probably true, and there are a lot of people who agree - but not enough. If the crowd in that picture represents a country of 350 million, then that one person represents maybe 0.5-1 million people? Which is way more than the supporters of a general strike.

Why did I say all that? Mostly because I'm bored - but I think it's a neat distinction to make.

[–] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

a "civilization" that involves "money" is simply not civilized.

shut up, you're fucking wrong. it said so in the post.

[–] undefinedValue@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Onions taste gross and have no tangible benefit to cooking. Fight me.

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This thread really has brought out some real crazies.

But you sir are, in fact, a demon among men.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I was gonna write something political but nah.

Pokemon Mystery Dungeon are some of the best Pokemon games, better than most of the (especially newer) main series games. I started with Pokemon Mystery Dungeon so I may be biased though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] derf82@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

If you actually want to do some about climate change, step 1 is to stop having kids.

[–] Glytch@ttrpg.network 0 points 2 years ago

Inverted controls are just better.

[–] Sanyanov@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

People are crazy when they promote closed-source AI (okay, okay, generative model) projects like ChatGPT, Bard etc.

This is literally one of the most important technologies of the future, and after all the times technology companies screwed them (us) up big time and monopolized the Internet, they go into the same trap again and again.

First they surrendered the free Internet, now they surrender the new frontiers.

Wake up, people. Go HuggingFace, advocate for free AI, and ideally - for a GPL one. We cannot afford for this part of our future to be taken away from us.

[–] Sunrosa@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I pointedly avoid ChatGPT for that reason. When the NovelAI leak happened, it was amazing, and the open ecosystem flourished in response. I just can't believe they call themselves OpenAi.

[–] Sanyanov@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Ah, that name was left from when they've been open-source, which us why I advocate for the emergence of GPL-licensed projects.

The open-source license for GPT model was very relaxed, which OpenAI took advantage of and, once it could afford their own programmer staff, closed the code with all the contributions all the programmers from all over the world have made.

It's an extremely dick move, and it was repeated by Google, too.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don’t use the current AI, specifically because it isn’t open source. Could I audit the code of an open source AI? Certainly not; it’s way over my head. However there would be an opportunity for experts to examine the source and report their findings. Currently? Black box, so no thanks.

There are so many projects that could become possible through novel use of an open source AI (or whatever it should actually be called).

Judging by the seemingly exponential improvements and integration, opinions such as ours are a grain of sand in Death Valley.

[–] Sanyanov@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

To be completely fair, even open-source AIs are a little bit of a black box due to the way neural networks work - but I'd greatly appreciate if we at least knew the parameters on which it is trained.

It is absolutely possible to train all sorts of biases in a closed-source AI, and that's what would be very hard in an open-source model. You can roughly set up outputs at whatever. In other ways, using open-source practically removes the malicious human factor (without removing positive impact)

Open-source models also can't be restricted, paywalled or limited in any meaningful way, which is also vital.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Abso-fucking-lutely. Time and time and time again proprietary technology fucks us over, this is no different.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments