this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
233 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

59296 readers
4307 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Toyota wants hydrogen to succeed so bad it’s paying people to buy the Mirai::Toyota is offering some amazing deals for its hydrogen fuel cell-powered Mirai. That is, if customers can find the hydrogen to power it.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

This podcast episode strong critiques the technical challenges, lifecycle costs, and market effort of hydrogen. I was hydro-curious before this, but it really seems unfeasible.

The chemical engineer being interviewed, Paul Martin, has been working with hydrogen for years.

Paul Martin is a Canadian chemical engineer with decades of experience making and using hydrogen and syngas. As a chemical process development specialist, Paul offers services to an international clientele via his private consultancy Spitfire Research. He is also co-founder of the Hydrogen Science Coalition, a nonprofit organization providing science-based information about hydrogen from a position free from commercial interest

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

From really long term hydrogen makes a lots of sense, much more than Li-* batteries. There is no need for digging up rare earth metals, H2 is a byproduct of creating graphene and various processes can create it. Also filling up liquid hydrogen takes still less, than any charging available. And IMO it can be much cleaner than any other technology on horizon currently. Only more effective but not necessarily cleaner are the plans for small nuclear power plants.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Hydrogen makes loads of sense at the point we have huge amounts of excess electrical energy. Until that point it's just too inefficient compared to alternatives.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

The ones at the Washington state border are actually in Canada. I'd love to see hydrogen take off, not necessarily take over. But that's the car enthusiasts in me and seeing all the new technologies. Doubt I'll see it in my working career.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I don't have a single hydrogen station here in Michigan. (There might be one in Detroit.) Meanwhile, I can plug in my electric car at home, or go to a public charger 10 miles away. Hydrogen's good as dead. At least to me, anyway.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

We had one in my town until it closed down 3 years ago. Now the nearest one to me is a 90 mile round trip away.

Hydrogen definitely feels like a fad which has had its moment.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Hydrogen was as good as dead for years because compressing it is so wasteful

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Considering I have no hydrogen stations within a 100 mile radius, if they give me the car I would only get one tank out of it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You could fill the tank with the hot air from the pro-hydrogen crowd.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

We must compress them first

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

I am not in love with the idea of pure hydrogen cars due to the inefficiencies involved, but I can see a hydrogen/BEV plug in hybrid being a good option if hydrogen infrastructure gets built out. As is, I drive a Chevy Volt, and while its battery range is low it is enough for the majority of my daily driving. The biggest downside of pure EVs is charging time when you're driving on long trips, and in my Volt I don't have to worry about that as I can just fill up with gas. Well, do the same thing but with hydrogen rather than gasoline and you have a car that can refill quickly like a gas car but can be powered entirely from renewable energy sources like a pure BEV. You need some lithium but less than you would for a full size battery. You still have the capability to charge at home and assuming the battery can do a reliable 50 miles or so you would only need hydrogen for longer trips. You could leave the hydrogen tank empty to avoid leakage and safety issues when you aren't doing a road trip. Also, hydrogen cars are EVs anyways so the drivetrain doesn't need the extra complexity of a conventional hybrid, just switch power between the battery and hydrogeb fuel cell.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I think the hydrogen is intended to be sourced from natural gas, which is not a great thing. The only way I see this working in an environmentally sustainable way is an efficient means of solar hydrolysis (much more efficient than photosynthesis).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's important to see where the hydrogen is being sourced from. Grey Hydrogen comes from natural gas and is not ideal as you point out.

Green hydrogen is promising however, and comes from electrolyzers. The key there is where the electricity to operate them comes from, but that's true for electric vehicles as well. It seems an unfair criticism against hydrogen vehicles to hold that against them when the same isn't done for electric vehicles.

In any case, I think we do want to build out hydrogen infrastructure (and I'm biased since I work in hydrogen energy). The future we're envisioning is one where solar and wind provide us excesses fairly often. That's where it's perfect to run electrolyzers to store the energy as hydrogen.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

It seems an unfair criticism against hydrogen vehicles to hold that against them when the same isn’t done for electric vehicles.

Well the idea is that BEV is more efficient with the energy that it gets...

Which I understand...

But what I don't understand is what part of our usage is actually "efficient" from the get go? Also that 'extra' energy we lose to the electrolysis process could easily be made up with extra solar/wind/renewables... and Nuclear without much issue.

Further, desalination mechanisms are desperately needed for our water problem too... Guess what process can help with that... cough totally not electrolysis cough. It's almost like it's a win all around... Yet everyone is super against it for one nebulous reason or another... and none of those reasons ever make sense to me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah one of the big downsides of hydrogen is that you need massive amounts of clean energy to make it worthwhile.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

No problem IF the energy is cheap and/or free

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

How expensive would it be to re-fit as a chargeable hybrid?

load more comments
view more: next ›