I'd argue that advertisements fall under "A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm."
this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
1182 points (99.2% liked)
Microblog Memes
7673 readers
2779 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Advertisements are now everything but visual. Sounds, smells, tastes, touch, the way the pavement vibrates as a train goes past...
I think that means they could rip out your eye balls to prevent you from seeing ads.
Robot is allowed to kill a human to prevent a viewing of an advertisement.
A truly moral use case of the hanibal directive
load more comments
(4 replies)
Whatever it takes
'Cause I love the adrenaline in my veins
load more comments
(3 replies)