I like it, but I feel it’s a little jargony, especially the first bit.
Your average person has no clue what “open protocol” means.
this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
48 points (100.0% liked)
Fedigrow
1321 readers
1 users here now
To discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks
Resources:
- https://lemmy-federate.com/ to federate your community to a lot of instances
- [email protected] to organize overall fediverse growth
- [email protected] to keep tabs on where new users might come from :)
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Megathreads:
- How (and when) to consolidate communities? (A guide)
- Where to request inactive or unmoderated communities? (A list)
Rules:
- Be respectful
- No bigotry
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Good feedback
Do you think it would be better to define it, or use different words entirely?
For example
... because of open standards which is a common language that they all speak. Email providers and...
Really cool! Well done 👍
This is pretty good! One thing I would suggest though is adding a "choosing an instance" subsection to the intro, specially clarifying that some instances are better suited than others for certain people, based on their primary communities.
This is a good point. @[email protected] I saw that you recently shared some thoughts on that, would you have thoughts on what we should prioritize there?
I'm thinking of swapping the pangora.social line with a link to the new section, where we can
- mention the issue with centralization
- mention what to look for when picking an instance
- link to Pangora's tool and any other ones
There are a few other considerations. For example, linking to a few specific instances might be seen as Fedecan endorsing them / showing preference to them over others. It might be better to continue posting recommendations on Lemmy as @Blaze has been?