this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
897 points (99.3% liked)

politics

20348 readers
3536 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

House Democrats, led by Rep. Pramila Jayapal, introduced the We the People Amendment to overturn Citizens United, aiming to curb corporate influence in elections.

The constitutional amendment asserts that constitutional rights apply only to individuals, not corporations, and mandates full disclosure of political contributions.

Jayapal cited Elon Musk’s massive campaign spending and subsequent financial gains as proof of the ruling’s harm.

Advocacy groups praised the move, calling it necessary to combat corporate power and dark money in politics, but Republicans have not backed the proposal.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

I hate to say it but proposing a constitutional amendment is just virtue signaling at this point. There isn’t a snowballs chance in hell this passes even with 100% democrat support.

I appreciate the thought and effort but put forth legislation that actually has a chance at passing.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago

Absolutely disingenuous to report this as "house Dems", as though the liberal (i.e. conservative) Dems are in on it. They are not. These are progressive Dems who propose this basically every year, and who are actually fighting for us, not corporations and profits. Liberal Dems then work with their Republican friends to shut it down. This is why liberal Dems are as much the enemy as the Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Where was this a decade ago?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because there's no chance in hell that this will pass under a Republican majority.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Get them on the fucking record. Keep introducing it and have it dominate news cycles. The biggest sense of optimistism I had during the Harris campaign was her specifically calling for a reform of corporate personhood.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Long overdue, and probably too late.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

True. I really wish they would focus on things they can actually do as the minority. Like, this is performative, but I'm not even sure for who it's supposed to be performative. Do dems honestly think there's even a single voter out there with the attitude of "well I wasn't going to vote next year, but after seeing dems moonshot yet another dead-on-arrival amendment about a 15-year old court ruling I'm on board!"

Look at what republicans were able to accomplish on the level of school boards, counties, churches, state houses, election commissions, etc while they were out of power and steal their playbook for goodness sake 😒

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Typical governing bullshit. Try to do something good for the actual public, but only when it has zero hope of passing. Notice how for the past 25 years, anytime they could push this through, it was never brought up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Losing a finger and losing a hand are different things.

Not making excuses for dems but I am sick of this fucking empty headed fucking bill Maher horseshit.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

A little too little, a little too late. They did jack shit when they had power.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Wow so brave. \s \s \s

Seriously tho. These people are phony AF. They had 4 years to actually do this. This is just political theater.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

I mean, they had 14 years didn't they?

Have they ever tried to pass an ammendment for this?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Can't expect much from them when they owe thier position to corporations to. It's been a dog and pony show for a long time.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›