this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
378 points (87.5% liked)

196

2181 readers
1480 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

There’s definitely some additional nuance (like a pronouns in bio/username situation) but this should cover the broad needs of anyone who is approaching this with good faith.

(page 3) 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

There's a lot of transphobes that use they/them to not acknowledge the pronouns of trans people, but also to skirt around anti-misgendering rules of social media. I call it "passive-aggressive misgendering".

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ask them, "why do you care so much about what genitals you think I have?"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This is so rubbish. Almost everyone is a he or she, so just use that. On the very very very rare instance you get it wrong, say sorry and use the correct one from then on. Unless you forget, the appologise again when corrected. Yes I am imply it is on the person who got called the wrong pronoun to correct the one who made the mistake.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I tend to agree, but I do get where the other viewpoint comes from. I'm from a country where I don't believe this is a major point of contention, as long as we're respectful with each other I don't think people feel the need to make a big deal out of this, but I'm aware I'm speaking from a bubble here, others may disagree.

I do work in an international company with many anglophones from the UK and USA, and it's a much bigger point there, to the point certain expressions are banned, e.g. addressing a group as guys. I speculate that it's a bit of a cultural thing, and a language thing. As others mention, a lot of languages are Ill suited to naturally use gender neutrality. English is quite malleable that way.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wouldn't it be much easier to use the grammatically well established singular they/them. That way you never run into an issue. Surely you'd do that when you encounter a name that can be used as both a female and a male name (Jessie, Les etc)

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If were going from whats «grammatically well established» i would argue he/she is a lot more established

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tbh just saying they is easier, took a few weeks/months to train myself to do it and now I'm just cringing whenever I hear something that's like "he or she could be doing this thing" when "they" is just more efficient anyway. They're just as established. I think "they" is an older term but I'd have to look into the etymology on that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

So I'm not sure how reliable it is given the age of the data but it looks like there's some indication that "they" fell in use up to the late 1900s but before ~1860 it was actually more common than now. I'm now curious if there's any more info on this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 week ago

Also, if you mistakenly use the wrong pronouns, apologize and respect their wishes.

We’re humans after all, and mistakes happens. No one is asking you to be perfect. People just want you to be a decent person.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

And then there are some languages where using pronouns for the secondary person is considered rude/weird in some conditions and you are supposed to use the name directly.
That's fun stuff.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If only there were gender neutral pronouns in my language 😭

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My only issue is when apparently someone can choose that "they", a gender neutral pronoun, doesn't apply to someone. I saw it in a recent Elliot Page post. Someone was getting ripped to shreds for talking about Elliot and saying "they". "No it's him! You're trying to minimize his identity!" was basically the response. But the person was talking about Elliots work pre and post transition and you could tell they were taking great care to not offend, and yet it was still offensive apparently. Which was then made even funnier when others chimed in to point out that Elliot specifically asks to be referred to as "They/Him".

My whole point is that some people need to cool it when it comes to gender neutral pronouns. Lest we forget, "I'm a dude, he's a dude, she's a dude, we're all dudes!"

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In arabic we don't even have neuter or non-gendered anythings, a table is a he or she.

Not even objects are safe 😔

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (4 children)

In German it feels completely random.

A table is masculine. A castle is feminine. A sausage is feminine. A boy is masculine. A girl is neutral. A fire is neutral. ...

Not sure if there's any meaningful rule behind.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As far as I know there isn't any rule to learn. Grammatical gender is a wild mixture of several things, sometimes it has something to do with the ending of words and sometimes with attributes of the things, if it has like agency, is an inanimate object, or is an abstract concept. Sometimes it's completely arbitrary and sometimes there are rules to it like with group of people. But there is no way of telling, you got to memorize it. In any way, grammatical gender has nothing to do with biological gender. And I'm pretty sure that's not it's origin. Though, we try to link it to biological gender in case of people. But even that has exceptions, and it doesn't really work with group of people etc.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Actually, Mädchen (meaning "girl" in German) is a diminutive. It comes from Magd (an old word for "maid" or "young woman") with the -chen suffix, which is a common diminutive in German.

The -chen suffix makes words grammatically neuter, which is why Mädchen takes das instead of die, even though it refers to a female person.

I'm not German but the same applies to the Dutch word for girl, and we've the same rule for neutral. By the way, 'magd' in Dutch means virgin (maagd to be precise), which sounds incredibly inappropriate to be going around calling someone; little virgin (/¯ ಠ_ಠ)/¯

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Unlike for girl, das Mädchen, which is a diminutive (of die Maid, a virgin young woman) as it is ending with -chen and thus, is of neutral gender, I doubt if rules for the other examples do exist:

  • Die Wurst (the sausage), female – der Durst (the thirst), male
  • Die Burg (the castle), female – der Zwerg (the dwarf), der Berg (the mountain), male
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh sorry I went out and commented the same thing ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Doesn't matter, as you elaborated more deeply on why das Mädchen has neuter gender.

BTW: The use of (das) Fräulein (miss), again a diminutive; 'little woman', in German, to refer to an unmarried woman has come out of fashion since ~50 years and now may be perceived as insulting as well.
Mädchen is no longer perceived as a diminutive of Maid or Magd, as both terms are more used in a historic context, and thus, it stands on its own.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some non binary people use the pronoun "they" in arabic, but unlike english it is exclusively meant for plural. And in arabic, verbs also are conjugated with amount, So you just can't say "They ate" in a singular form, you have to explicitly mark "ate" in plural.

It'd be like saying "they ate(plural verb)". It sounds very weird but there's not much better.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There's a similar — though very localised — thing in English with "themself."

The singular form is used, but it's far less common than the plural form "themselves." I often hear "themselves" used to refer to one non-binary person and it always sounds weird.

I guess we have to work with what we have. Is there an alternative in Arabic, like neopronouns?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Your comment made me try to think of one, and all I got was a headache.

In arabic everything is gendered. Even the most simple pronoun "I" changes the form of the sentence based on your gender (ie masculine: "ana ju'an" fem: "ana ju'ana"

Even the numbers and verbs are gendered. To try to add a new gender would be rethinking the entire language.

But in Arabic masculine pronouns are considered normal. Even with feminine objects like the sun, you can use a masculine pronoun "hua kabir" He (it) is big. So most enbies I know of just use masculine pronouns. There may be an alternative I don't know of. It's an interesting yet complex topic.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd say default should be to offer your own name/pronouns to encourage someone to share rather than asking.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Super fair! I guess I would categorize or lump that in as a tactful and warm way of “asking” but I absolutely am with you for that suggestion. 🤗

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 week ago (2 children)

AND HOLY SHIT does it get toxic. for some reason there’s no will for even this basic level of nuance. currently watching an entire anti-blahaj hate crusade over a simple misunderstanding where the left and the right conclusions of the chart got conflated as though they are the same thing.

then i tried to help clarify and got called insults.

just… so sad :(

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (11 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

see my comment history if you are truly interested. fair warning: it’s fucken bad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think one of the issues is that several of the people involved in that crusade were also banned from blahaj.

People tend to not disclose their conflict of interest.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That’s a very probably true analysis :(

Relevant meme post of what brought on a lot of those bans for onlookers.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›