this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
29 points (100.0% liked)

Star Trek

10613 readers
52 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episodes, as well as previews for upcoming episodes. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-21 LD 5x06 "Of Gods and Angles"
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"
12-12 LD 5x09 "Fissue Quest"
12-19 LD 5x10 "The New Next Generation"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (2025)

Section 31 (2025-01-24)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)

In Development

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.


Allied Discord Server


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's something that has bothered me since I realised

Or if they don't have onboard sensors designed to do that then why not do that

Because someone who is unconscious or unable to move isn't going to be able to call for help

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Rick Sanchez's garage could do that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The computers in star trek have no real intelligence, everything needs user input. I mean, their weapons don't even auto aim.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Except for that time the enterprise became intelligent in emergence and birthed a new lifeform

And someone just needs to program that function in

Edit: to clarify I'm talking about programming a function in for medical emergency detection and not computer intelligence

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A lot of my head canon around this and the notable lack of automation prevalent in Starfleet: it's a futuristic, post-scarcity jobs program. Yes, it's about exploration and rendering assistance and all that. But it gives people something to do, a way to serve the whole. Picard said as much to Geordi when Scotty was aboard. I've of the many things Starfleet does is give people a sense of usefulness.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Almost, but quite to point of human "jobs" in The Culture books, where benevolent AIs actually run everything. Humans are considered by the AIs as pets.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act

HIPAA

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Ty. Not American

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

On the good side people could just be teleported into medbay if their metrics are out of bounds. Though probably teleporting a lot of people exercising or having sex. It would be a hilarious plot point

On the bad side, O'Brien could just teleport in a new copy of you from the pattern buffer of your last teleport when you die

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's not how the pattern buffer works. It's extremely unstable. And patterns can neither be copied, nor scanned without destroying a person

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Scotty is a genius and he was doing something that had never been done before. Continuously transporting himself to preserve the buffer. Not the same as just keeping a pattern in storage.

Besides, patterns can't be duplicated by a computer. It's not like a CD you can copy and burn. It's more like a vinyl record governed by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

He demonstrated it was possible, and once a military knows something is possible they will develop the capability to make it a strategic one.

We're talking about hypotheticals, in this scenario anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Apparently they didn't, the man canonical continues working after they rescue him

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Okay, so the hypothetical is that the Enterprise is now equipped with 1000 transporters each cycling the pattern of one crew member... Except it still doesn't work anyway, because if the crew members are in transporter buffers they can't be out doing their jobs at the same time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Okay, so the Enterprise installs 1000 transporters, enough power systems to run them all continuously, goes to the Thomas Riker planet, waits for a freak weather storm, duplicates the entire crew, puts all the duplicates in transporters, holds them there as backups.... And then all of the transporter clones die as soon as there's a battle and an EPS relay blows.

That's not how the Federation does things. They're the good guys.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Just because they aren't transporter purgatory bad, doesn't make them good.

The federation has unintentionally done and continues to do real irreversible harms. They also do good intentionally. There aren't a lot of examples of experiments being set up in a risk reducing way...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes, he could teleport a copy of myself but I would still be dead then, my soul sipping tea with the interdimensional koala while watching my copy do all the stuff I no longer can.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

That happens the first time you use a transporter. Those things kill you and print a copy elsewhere that thinks it's you

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

I think the canon reason given for this and other "why didn't the ship's computer just stop them?" situations that it's a privacy violation to just go around scanning people without their permission.

Although they do seem to do a lot of "scanning for life-signs" so who knows?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

scanning for life-signs

Yeah, and I've never figured out the security feature that makes scanning for life-signs more effective when you sign a little song to the computer. But sometimes I guess it's just more urgent to know, little life signs, where are you?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

It's based on the same technology that makes you turn faster in Mario Kart if you tilt your head and turn the controller like a steering wheel.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Since when was there an expectation of privacy on a Starfleet ship?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Starfleet is not the military as they are so often having to remind everyone

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

First thing I'd do when boarding a Federation ship is tell the computer it's authorized to keep an eye on my vitals.