Academia

971 readers

28 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

As a nonsense phrase of shady provenance makes the rounds, Elsevier defends its use (retractionwatch.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

ELsevier is trash and should be destroyed, they profit off of paywalling human research.

Resist by using Annas's Archive, libgen and other dark libraries as much as possible so they don't get a dime. Or if a paper really interests you, try emailing the authors directly to request a copy; many are happy to give their papers out (so I'm told).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Resist by using Anna's Archive, libgen and other dark libraries

Hey, it works for Meta! /s

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Rules for thee but not for me, right /s

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

[email protected]