this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
16 points (100.0% liked)

The Verge

185 readers
37 users here now

News community for TheVerge. Will be deleted or retired once the Verge officially supports ActivityPub in their site.


This is an automated RSS-Feed community. If you dislike RSS Feed communities consider blocking it, or the bot.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The BYD Seal.

The Chinese EV-maker BYD says it will pay for any damage caused by its upgraded self-parking system, as reported earlier by Fast Company. A translated version of BYD’s announcement on Weibo says the company “will fully cover the safety and losses” of vehicles damaged by its God’s Eye self-parking system, which it claims has reached Level 4 autonomy.

So far, only Mercedes-Benz has built a Level 4 parking system, allowing select vehicles to park without human intervention. But, this feature isn’t available everywhere just yet — Mercedes-Benz drivers can only use the technology inside the Stuttgart Airport’s parking garage.

Other automakers offer parking assist features, but Tesla’s Elon Musk has been particularly vocal about making vehicles fully autonomous. Right now, Tesla’s Autopilot and Full Self-Driving systems offer Level 2 autonomy, meaning drivers must be ready to take over if needed. Tesla also offers an Autopark feature, but, as pointed out by Fast Company, some drivers have reported that it can be inaccurate.

BYD, which has surpassed Tesla in annual sales, says customers who damage their vehicle while using its self-parking feature don’t need to go through their insurance and can contact the company directly. “BYD’s move not only reflects its absolute confidence in the technology of the Eye of God, but also demonstrates its attitude of being responsible to consumers to protect the safety of users,” a machine-translated version of BYD’s Weibo post says.

Outside of self-parking, God’s Eye is a Level 2 system that comes in three different variants, with the most advanced — God’s Eye A — featuring three LiDar sensors and reserved for luxury vehicles.


From The Verge via this RSS feed

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Will they cover damage to other vehicles, structures, people and animals? Covering your vehicle is a good first step towards accountability, but, unless they cover the damage the vehicle does to others, it's not enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I think it should be expected for them to cover that. Don't car companies have a legal obligation if their vehicle malfunctions?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

This is the first step I’ve seen a company take towards taking responsibility for their automated driving systems. This should be the norm. If I’m not driving, I shouldn’t be paying for the damages.