this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
1277 points (98.6% liked)

Science Memes

14627 readers
166 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

something that does count:
a dream about a snake eating it's own butt (cool story btw)

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 36 points 3 months ago (2 children)

But I said the phrase "scientists don't know everything" so now you have to listen to my bullshit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 months ago
  • an anecdote your cousin told you
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

While they don't refute it, enough of those do prevent better science from happening though, especially when it's needed.

[–] Pippipartner@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 months ago

Foucalt would probably be opinionated on this.

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hey, but measles in Texas, and tuberculosis in Missouri, are making comebacks!
Ivermectin! RFKjr! Bleach!

Learn to ReSeArcH!!

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Aren't those just from the gay space lasers and Jewish hurricanes? I feel like their resistance means we're on the right path.

[–] will_a113@lemmy.ml 34 points 3 months ago (3 children)

ok, but what about three Youtube videos?

[–] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As long as they're shorts, only showing one vague, unverifiable, third or fourth hand anecdote each.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

That makes sense. I heard that my college roommate's pen pal said something like that.

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe, if they're from potholer54

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

All hail potholer54! The guy is awesome

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Are they at least 3rd-hand, (or more) spurious sources with an inscrutable chain of custody, because if not, you can miss with that.

[–] will_a113@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

Are they at least 3rd-hand, (or more) spurious sources with an inscrutable chain of custody

Is there any other kind?

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Counterpoint: nuh-uh (They et. al., good ol' days).

Citations

They et. al. (Good ol' days). Trump proves that YouTube videos about The Creator that validate your feelings are equivalent to science. Many People Are Saying, 1(2), 10–20. Things I done heard. https://doi.org/I forget

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Counter-counterpoint: uh... damnit, I forgot the tooth (already!?).

A statement which somehow makes so much more sense than the rest of 2025 so far.

You might want to banana.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thanks, I was wondering what a tiny bit of partially digested dinner would taste like.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shadow_wolf@aussie.zone 23 points 3 months ago (3 children)

That why its such a shame that big corporations can and do regularly buy scientists opinions in exchange for funding setting up a ill give $xxx.xxx for your environmental impact study to not blame my coal mine. Thus by negating the peer review process. science can sadly no longer be taken at face value with out knowing who funded it and why. i miss trusting scientists who are clearly smarter than me because they fell in to the capitalist greed trap RIP real science we should have treated you better and i am sorry.

[–] Mavvik@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How often does this actually happen? The cases where this does occur stand out because they are rare. I really hate the implication that scientists are not trustworthy because some individuals acted in bad faith. Scientific fraud is real but it doesn't mean you can't trust science.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is why you never trust a single source. For anything. Reputable news organizations have never trusted single sources, they always use multiple sources to verify information they are told. Science is not immune from this, and never has been. And even for those that you've followed in the past, times change, especially in a capitalist society with a massive oligarchy that owns the news companies, like modern western civilizations. Trust, but verify.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 85 points 3 months ago (4 children)

don't worry, science as conclusions derived from research will soon be replaced by bullshit psuedo-research-AI-word-vomit derived from equally bullshit pre-determined conclusions

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Did you write this with deepseek?

[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 37 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This has already been done by politicians and continues to this day

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments