this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
399 points (96.5% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

4535 readers
91 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out [email protected] (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Maybe it's time to lead their scientists to Germany as payback for the brain drain directly after the war.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

We discussed it thoroughly when they laid out the plan to dismantle the country and make it a dictatorship hyper capitalist stigh. You chose that option, presumably because so many are uneducated swines and future billionaires

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago

A lot of posts to that subreddit are thinly veiled cosplay to get conservatives to question their cult.

They usually slip in during the first few hours/weeks of a new Trump disaster before their mods/subscribers have a chance to review marching orders from Fox and start removing/downvoting accordingly.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

We really need to study why people believe conservative when they lie but disbelieve them when they tell the truth.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

"Because HER EMAIL! LOCK HER UP!"

"Btw, prosecution against a political opponent is a witchhunt... FREE TRUMP!"

"BACK THE BLUE"

"Also, FUCK THE POLICE at the capitol building on Jan 6"

🙄

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Leaded water, brain injuries, or education that teaches them 1+1=3

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Some version of only hearing what they want to I guess?

[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

TL;DR: this isn't stupidity unraveling. It's the Oligarchic takeover of academia and science

It's cute that the post assumes ignorance. We are way past the Hanlon's razor phase. Cutting indirects is a way to punch $10-100M holes into elite universities' budgets overnight, sow fear and render them financially vulnerable. The prestigious universities will be bailed out by private donations and boom, you have an unprecedented scale of oligarchic influence of leading academic institutions and academic research.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's the same playbook that they used for public schools, strip funding, let the school flounder, then they'll start asking "well what have these universities contributed lately? Why should we fund their research when they haven't discovered anything recently?"

The only colleges that will stay standing will be the networking hubs for their rich sons to plot the best ways to ~~exploit the working class~~ get business and economics degrees.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

yup. Ironically, NIH grants lead to quite tangible discoveries, and institutions with the highest indirects (overhead funding) usually have proportionally higher rate of major discoveries. So the original poster isn't wrong about this hamstringing US biomedical research. On another thread someone proposed that Canada should have a grant-buyout brain drain program for refugees from US academia. It was actually a pretty smart one. The EU could also bank on this.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've heard rumblings of foreign countries already offering deals to phds in the US.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

yup. the US will taste its own medicine with brain drain

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Even worse... They're going to celebrate it.

Deny university funding, dismantle the department of education, religious schools become the only institutions that can survive, government funnels money into the "best" educational choice...

I see where this is going & I hate it already.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago

I have a PhD, I work in biotech and have been working on obtaining state and federal grants with University Minnesota. Indirects are like 55-60% for land grant institutions that don't have to pay for the property they operate on, additionally they have nearly 40k undergrads paying 17-38k a year in tuition. So the scope of the research and the staff we can budget for comes from the 40-45% remaining, this includes funding techs, post docs, and the personnel that directly run the projects.

No I didn't vote for these fools, and exponentially more damage than good is coming, and I'm good friends with postdocs who are getting screwed in real time by this nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nobody ask industry how much they crib (read: steal) from publically funded research.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why leave us hanging? Go on...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Drug companies largely use pathways discovered by academic research (which is much more trial and error) as targets for pharmaceuticals. "Steal" is a bit of a strong word, but they are okay with paying students and post-docs starvation wages. Essentially, it's privatizing profits and publicizing losses.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks for the explanation. I literally took it to mean something completely different so I'm glad you elaborated.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

Starvation wages is just stealing with extra steps. No need to equivocate.

load more comments
view more: next ›