No horizontal tabs makes it useless for tablets and larger screens.
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
19 points (64.2% liked)
Firefox
17865 readers
8 users here now
A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
The following PR actually implements a desktop like UI for firefox android.Hope it will be in atleast beta soon.
https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/firefox-android/pull/5218#issuecomment-1966233109
I actually prefer Chrome over Firefox. But fuck Google and fuck Chrome.
I'm happier since leaving Chrome and Google for Firefox and DuckDuckGo. I no longer have to use Incognito to do regular searches to prevent seeing that search as a recommendation in feeds and videos.
That's really creepy, I forgot Google did that. Been with Kagi for a while.
I'm just glad that it exists at all. Google has Chrome tied down on Android because they feel they can.
Isn't a low minimum API level a good thing? Doesn't that mean more people can use the app?
Exactly. I think that has more value than being a little prettier or having the latest features.
It does get a lot of updates too, for example better PDF support and more extensions working. So it's not like it's stagnated, it's just being refined. A few years ago, Firefox for Android was really slow and almost unusable, and now it's solid.
So I really don't see what OP doesn't like.
I'm pretty sure the reason why it doesn't use Material Design is to protect it's own branding. Material Design is Google's after all.
Chromium browsers are much worse in my experience. They don't even support extensions
Internet without full on uBlock Origin is crazy full of ads.
fyi cromite and bromite allow to disable cookies, javascript, popups, ads, and autoplay. (per site and global)
similar to noscript maybe.
i would rather have more or full control like ublock or umatrix.
I've been using Firefox and Ublock origin on my Samsung a70 for a long time. I'm :).
Ad block alone is a big performance boost, which is especially noticeable on mobile. I can't stand using my wife's phone (iPhone) because of the ads on the browser.
Is "generally lacking in features" relative to desktop Firefox or other mobile browsers?
Also idk why you'd want Material UI. Not even chrome uses it AFAIK.
Not OP, but Firefox Android is lacking in features compared to both. For example, when it comes to bookmarking, it is painfully behind its desktop counterpart. Not only is there no desktop style bookmark manager to be found, but bigger folder structures are hard to visualize because subfolders are barely indented when you need to look for them.
I could probably write a short essay about bookmark and tab treatment, and the pseudo-tab that shows up when you tap Home, New Tab, or the URL bar itself. Browsers shouldn't have a learning curve that requires you to acknowledge the pseudo-tab isn't really a tab.
Mobile browsers.
What features do you want?
Not OP, but the one thing that bugs me most is that Firefox Android does not have a tablet UI. Other browsers like Chrome have a tab bar and other desktop-like UI features when run on Android tablets.
But on phone I've never run into a case of wanting a feature that it lacks.
I'm in the same boat as you, but it seems that Mozilla is finally going to try to improve the tablet UI this year: https://www.androidpolice.com/firefox-tablet-ui-being-developed/
Edit: I went down the rabbit hole and enabled the tab strip in Firefox nightly and I can confirm that they already implemented a huge chunk of what's needed for a proper tablet UI and IMO do it much better than Chrome.
I've never noticed any issues probably because I almost never use a web browser on my tablet, I use it almost exclusively for video streaming. That's too bad the tablet experience is subpar, maybe file a feature request or vote for an existing one?
Firefox for Android might not be that great in terms of performance, but is a viable option out of the Chrome eco system. Firefox Sync works. The only thing its lacking at the moment is universal support for all existing Firefox plugins.
if performance isnt great, then there are 1000 settings to help you fix it.
How is performance not great? About 2-3 years ago, they made a huge amount of improvements to Firefox performance, to the point where it's plenty fast. I have it set as my default browser and have actually disabled Chrome so Firefox is used for everything.
Performance is more than sufficient for me, and I've done a mix of playing browser games and regular browsing and haven't had any issues. And this isn't on a flagship phone or anything, it's just a Moto G Power. I don't really notice any performance issues, and it's probably actually faster than Chrome on average because my ad blocker means i have to render far less stuff.
No performance issue on my Firefox too. I have Ublock origin.
It particularly sucks for desktop use on phones that support it, no right click, no keyboard short cuts, and it clips a bit off the bottom of pages, and they've apparently said they have no plans to support desktop on Android.
Forks like Mull and Fennec technically have access to all avaliable plugins, but it a bit annoying to set up. I don't know why they don't add an option to enable adding all plugins, with a disclaimer that some of them might not function as intended on Android.
All of the plugins I've tried in Fennec have worked just fine.
That kind of changed recently, hasn't it? There's been an explosion of available plugins as if late.
Every app has a minimum API level. The older the Android version, the more expensive it becomes to maintain it. What features do you miss?