this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
1800 points (99.0% liked)

World News

46785 readers
2179 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Australia has enacted strict anti-hate crime laws, mandating jail sentences for public Nazi salutes and other hate-related offenses.

Punishments range from 12 months for lesser crimes to six years for terrorism-related hate offenses.

The legislation follows a rise in antisemitic attacks, including synagogue vandalism and a foiled bombing plot targeting Jewish Australians.

The law builds on state-level bans, with prior convictions for individuals performing Nazi salutes in public spaces, including at sporting events and courthouses.

(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah. How about from 1948?

[–] [email protected] 56 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Sending people to jail is a great way to make sure they don't spend time embroiled in Nazi ideology on every level. Probably the best way to make sure someone never comes in contact with a single particle of Nazism, is to send them to prison.

(Can you tell I'm american?)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I sat on a jury recently and a large part of the case had to do with prison culture. It's so incredibly sad how accurate this is.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

My dad was a prison guard, I've thought about some of these dynamics a lot over the years.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 months ago (11 children)

Yeah, but most of the people I imagine pulling a Nazi salute "as a joke like Elon (were so hilarious haha look at those [insertracialslur])" might be deterred from pulling their shitty "joke" if it actually means prison time automatically. It doesn't matter if it's just like a week. Try explaining to an employer why you didn't attend the important meeting you had because you sat in jail for a week for a fascist "joke".

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I mean free speech is a deeply contradictory concept, which i largely support, however, people having the "right" to harm others as fascists mean to do is not a human right but a right of domination, which I am actively and deeply set against. And prison justice is just a "right" to harm others, only one that we are conditioned to live with.

It does create an opportunity for a little irony, which I can't pass up.

But part of my criticism is not just "Nazis exist in prison" but "carcerial justice is just as fascistic as anything we associate with fascism" which never gets even thought about let alone discussed anywhere but the fringes of the prison abolition movement.

And things like prisons and police, the existence of many kinds of crime, particularly property crimes, need to be considered historically contingent, so that no matter how much we want to just delete all prisons they do serve as a solution to contradictions that arise within our society. So that the struggle to abolish carcerial punishment has to be simultaneously replaced with something better. Which is just and worth fighting for.

Getting rid of heil Hitler hand gestures in public might prevent the public proliferation of "signs" of fascism, the actual causes of it are institutional and function in cooperation with systems of institutional racism, Etc., and until those tendencies are abolished, and that is the worst expressions of class domination within capitalism, fascism will always be a problem to contend with.

In other words, we have fascism because we have prisons. Or rather, the underlying logic of fascism is just the underlying logic that justifies carcerial justice, taken to its natural conclusions.

So its not just irony, its like a double irony

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

“carcerial justice is just as fascistic as anything we associate with fascism” which never gets even thought about let alone discussed anywher

Yeah because it's childish strawman. Of course it's not the same to have to spend a day in a drunk tank because you lost control and were kicking off mirrors from cars as it is to be marched into a gaschamber.

That's false equivalency.

Also, if you had ever picked up a single philosophy book, you'd know how much positive and negative freedoms and the right of the government to impose those on others is actually discussed. It's like >95% of what philosophy has been going on about for the 1000 years.

Getting rid of heil Hitler hand gestures in public might prevent the public proliferation of “signs” of fascism, the actual causes of it are institutional and function in cooperation with systems of institutional racism,

Not really. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demagogue

In other words, we have fascism because we have prisons.

Fucking roflmao, literally. Well I didn't drop to the floor but I did roll around giggling a bit on my chair. I would suggest reading "Leviathan" from Hobbes, but since I know you won't, here's a video sort of summarising Hobbes' thoughts, by a professional philosopher called Alain de Botton and his channel "School of Life" POLITICAL THEORY - Thomas Hobbes

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Alain de Botton omg and you thought I was funny.

Anyway you completely missed my point wrt false equivalence since both things are true. Its called nuance, dingus. I believe in the continual progress of human spirit, similar to Hegel's formulation of freedom, but I'm a materialist and Marxist, not right wing liberal like Hobbes. Because believe it or not society has progressed since the 1680s when the ascendent English bourgeoisie seized control of the British empire and needed rational justification for their rule -- which Thomas Hobbes Leviathan is. Its a piece of political philosophy, and certainly worth studying. I haven't read it and might not, but I know others that have. I get the gist I don't need Alain de Buttman's watered down baby philosophy for online babies, please and thank you.

I've read thousands of pages of philosophy. You've watched thousands of hours of vaush and destiny. We are not the same. Come back when you're capable of making a point or having an adult discussion. I'll be here.

Actually if you could point to the place in the book where he argues definitively for carcerial justice over other forms, effectively addressing arguments that have come since from intellectuals like Michel Foucault and Angela Davis, as well as the abolition movement more broadly, that would be super helpful to a big dumb idiot like me a hurr durr

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Oh you're laughing at it because he's so familiar to you because it's the most "hardcore" philosophy you've ever engaged with? Yeah, I assumed as much.

That's why I assumed you wouldn't read "Leviathan" and from all your writing it's clear you never have previously. Or even listened to a summary. Perhaps had those playing in the background, pretending like you've been listening to them.

The way you can't distinguish a thought from the philosopher who brought it up shows that you larp as being read instead of being read.

I don’t need Alain de Buttman’s watered down baby philosophy for online babies, please and thank you.

Oh you most certainly do. It would definitely improve your skill on larping as a philosopher if you had the ability to pay any attention.

I’ve read thousands of pages of philosophy.

Thanks. That got rid of some phlegm. THOUSANDS of pages you say. Wow. That must be like... at least a half a dozen books. :D

We'll continue the conversation when you understand how asinine your earlier garbage is. If you weren't an egoistical teenager who's all about what other's perceive for them to have read and done and actually put import on understanding the things people say to you, you would at least skim what the Leviathan is about so you'd know what point I was making. But the fact you're incapable of even understanding that means that I'm simply not interested in anything you have to say as you have zero intellectual curiosity. That sort of youthful egoism is fine, as long as it's driven by actual intellect.

Yours isn't.

Your previous comment. It looks a bit like how ridiculous it looks to you to now look illustrations of what people in the late 19th century thought the 21st century would look like. Firemen with flappy wings and whatnot. It's utterly ridiculous because you know that would be the absolute worst way to go about flying. Either the wings would have to be absolutely massive or go really fast and still they'd be much worse than most other options we have for personal flying we can already achieve, like the jetpacks. The reason I'm saying this is that is what it looks like to me when reading your "arguments". I can see how someone ignorant of political theory might formulate a naive theory like that, but the theory itself is utterly ridiculous and wouldn't work because of facts you do not seem to know.

If you have even the tiniest bit of intellectual curiosity, you'll look up what the Leviathan is about (while remembering to distinguish between an author and an idea) and then you'll see why your earlier assertions are laughably naive.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Honestly what else is there to do? These people aren’t exactly going to change their minds, and letting them display hate in the name of free speech is only going to help them mobilize and elect more trumps in the world.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (6 children)

I don't know we do it, but I think addressing the root causes as to why people are drawn to hate groups or hateful beliefs would be better. Eliminating the symptom doesn't solve the problem.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Well I say it elsewhere, but we need to really start to rethink carcerial justice as a solution to social problems. It doesn't help, it just compounds the contradictions that lead to problems like crime, fascism in the first place.

I understand we can't just snap our fingers to make it go away. But The first step is discussion.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

One year's mandatory jail term for any "hate-related offenses" seems a bit far imo. Should be just a fine at least for first offense *on the lightest end, unless it's some physical attack and stuff like that.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's basically a tax on not being rich enough to be a nazi, which... well.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (11 children)

Do you think the same about any traffic violation or all fines in general? We should throw people in the jail for a year, mnimum, because otherwise it's just a tax on not being rich enough for the crime?

Come on now. I'm all for having tougher sentences on the high end for hate related offenses, but a mandatory minimum being year in jail for any such offense, even some dipshit doing a Nazi salute and nothing is else, is just too much. It's like said, dipshit behaviour but hardly worth a year in jail. And it probably won't solve the issue anyway. Just putting people in jail seldom does imo. Yanks have already tried that.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You’re playing into the paradox of tolerance. Don’t do that.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's nothing to do with paradox of tolerance to think a year's mandatory jail time for a year is pretty ridiculous for any "hate-related offenses".

I'm against in general of just throwing people into the slammer and hoping that fixes the issues. Punishment should fit the crime and some dipshit doing some Nazi salute isn't worth a year in goddamn prison. Give them a hefty fine for first time, sure, but a mandatory sentence of a year for any such offense, just seems too far.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (14 children)

Why stop at jail time? Why not execute them?

Edit: the point is to consider what level of punishment is appropriate, not to actually execute anyone.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

a paywall for a moral breach sounds like a horrendous idea

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

If you consider a fine just a paywall then do you feel like there should be jail sentence for all traffic violations too, for example? A bit ridiculous, imo.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›