Closeup. Credit to Ken Fager
this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
973 points (98.7% liked)
People Twitter
5925 readers
805 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Noooo do not make my AK-47 gay >:((
Looks like a member of the military to me. Are libs of tiktok suddenly afraid of guns?
The precious, precious, precious second amendment will be very selective any time now.
Hell yeah.
There's are multiple leftist gun associations and they all have my full support (and the SRA has my membership).
Unlike the MAGA lunatics, the left actually has something to protect: those who are under attack and are unable to protect themselves. The women and the LGBTQ+ people in our country NEED to be able to protect themselves because the government is obviously not interested in their safety.
These organizations are not militias. We don't plan attacks, we don't conspire to subvert order. Our purpose is to train and protect those who need protection the most.
Nice
As an American....fuck yea!
##RUN FOR YOUR LIFE
#IT IS THE MYTHICAL ANTIFAAAAA
If this thing goes on for four years as it has gone for the last 2 weeks, there's definitely going to be some mass shootings committed by trans people in USA.
I fully intend (and I'm aware of the risks of saying this online, I don't care), to burn down government buildings if they actually declare war on Canada. Until then, I'll keep to my peaceful protesting and spreading happiness and dissent at my workplace until there's enough wiggle room for a union to show up
Hey bud.
Don't say incriminating things on social media just because you're behind a username.
The glowies are watching, and the Fediverse doesn't really protect your anonymity in general while also being run by individuals who can be arrested and their servers seized without having a corporate oligarchy getting upset about it.
And, just as a general rule:
Do, or do not.
Threat displays are for chimps.
As stated, I'm well aware of the risks involved with this kind of statement. Again, as stated, I'm not concerned.
While this statement is a threat to my OpSec, my government is currently incapable of tying my name or identity to a phone number. By the time they start caring about my comment right here, I'll have much bigger issues. (I know that claim sounds ridiculous but it's actually been a regular hurdle in my life. My documents have been fucked up by so many different agencies that it's very difficult to figure out who I am)
Also, threat displays are not just for chimps. The cold war had real, tangible impacts on the world. Protects have real, tangible impacts on the world. Riots get things done too, but so do threats.
I am all for this wave of "Pink Panthers" arming themselves. Hopefully it will lead to some actual gun control laws, because it scares the cowardly fascists.
I understand what you mean, but unfortunatly they could just make those potential laws only restrict LGBTQ+ gun owners while protecting themselves from any retribution.
Yep maggots would say "sex offenders" should be banned from gun ownership
Let me reiterate. Maggots have attempted to label the entire LGBTQ community as sex offenders against children only because of their orientation. This would be their playbook for grabbing their guns without having to give up theirs
I'd like the laws to be sensible though. Please.
No guns for the gays!
You joke, but carry and purchase laws were literally created to stop black people from carrying or purchasing X locally "restricted" item, but over time some areas stopped using them that way and got more permissive about it, some areas started making it harder for everyone so at least it isn't racist but fuck everybody, and some areas still use what laws are in place for their intended purpose (see: North Carolina recently took away their pistol purchase permit requirement, but before they did 60% of denials were to african americans.)
It very well might be no guns for gays/trans, it would just be worded differently as "concealed carry permits" or "purchase permits" that "require review" by the local authorities including your social media as many advocate for or medical history (that one may be harder because HIPPA but would be called "mental health checks" officially, requiring you to sign a waiver when applying for the permit.) Or by using all that data that people who "have nothing to hide" are freely giving to companies that sell it to the NSA, "sorry ~~our database says you visited the local gay bar 'buttchuggers' a whole bunch,~~ we don't think you're morally fit to own firearms and have denied your request." It could happen. Will it? Who knows, but they did it to a different group before and could very well do it again.
On the plus side they can't fuck with their own base too hard, so we probably don't have to worry about some of that any time soon like the mental health checks. Anything already in place like CCW permits however can safely be abused, and blamed on the democrats if anyone in their base even cares (as they won't be further affected by abuse of the existing laws than they already are.)
"It's not fair if they have guns!"
That's why gun laws were put into place. Honkies got scared because black panthers were arming themselves against their racist shit.
view more: next ›