this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

12572 readers
117 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The dildo of consequences rarely arrives lubed.

I'm really not a fan of the cops arguing that the cyclist was partly to blame, though, and a €1000 fine is pretty damn low for breaking someone's leg and wrecking a good six months of their life.

(page 2) 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (11 children)

There's always an excuse for drivers.

If a driver isn't paying attention, it doesn't matter what colour a cyclist's clothing are, or that they had a helmet on, or insanely bright lights.

And if excuses are being shifted onto cyclists, what about pedestrians and buildings that drivers smash into on a regular basis? What excuse do you have then?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, I also fail to see how wearing a helmet would've prevented his leg from being broken as well

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Yeah, the helmet is a bit much.

Not wearing appropriate clothing and headphones while on the road is a fair point though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Not wearing appropriate clothing and headphones while on the road is a fair point though.

I've nearly been hit several times (like tires screaching to a halt) while wearing high-viz clothing with the right of way.

It makes no difference when the driver isn't paying attention.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (4 children)

What's clothing that allows me to not be at fault for being run over?

I thought traffic laws are only about having two breaks, lights at night etc

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm not talking about being at fault.

I don't care about court, I'd rather not be run over.

This case seems like an honest accident, I don't think the driver is too blame too much here. The cyclist got into a blind spot (which is why I hate roundabouts for cyclists) and got hit.

Nobody seems truly at fault here, but making others more aware of yourself, and being more aware yourself might have made this avoidable.

Bad road design is yet again the biggest party to blame here.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Something reasonably reflective and visible in low light.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I’m not really familiar with the laws over there. After this criminal ruling, does the cyclist now have grounds for a civil suit?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›