this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
1039 points (97.5% liked)

Political Memes

5888 readers
3022 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

You only have to talk sense.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 18 hours ago (10 children)

They are slowly leaking into lemmy.world, my friends living in .world please try your best to hold your position there. Don't let them break through

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 20 hours ago

Whenever beating up fascists and their sympathizers is a question the answer is always yes >:3

[–] [email protected] 32 points 20 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 87 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

We should keep them all trapped on twitter forever.

It's a good containment zone for the trash.

If you see someone supporting Trump tell them to go back to twitter and block them

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

Just had to block someone that said wanting a democracy and not supporting a dictatorship was "Chasing perfection at the cost of the good".

[–] [email protected] 17 points 19 hours ago

That's wild given a dictatorship has the whole issue of succession, even with a perfectly benevolent leader they gonna die one day.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago

haha goddamn

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

So much harder to manufacture consent without centralized gatekeepers

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago

That makes me wonder, what comes after decentralized gatekeepers?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Chances are, fediverse will end up with right wing instances that only communicate with themselves and maybe some centrists, left wing will only communicate with themselves and maybe some centrists, centrists will see all

[–] [email protected] 13 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

centrists will see all

I dunno, has this ever actually happened? I think centrists almost universally end up backing the right-wing. Hell, the Centrists were vital in the Nazi's coming to power, and it literally would not have happened without them.

And the 'left wing' is going to be a fractured bunch that overlap slightly, yet Social Democrats, Marxists, Anarcha-Feminists, these 'left wing' groups have vastly different ideas of the best way to help everyone, and I don't see Centrists asking the Anarchists what's up. Centrists are how we got neo-Liberalism, and 'well we can't BAN abortion... but we can limit it unless the woman is...' They want an 'inbetween' in an era when fascists have taken over the most powerful country in the world, with the open backing of fascists/authoritarians in other nations. What's the centrist response to concentration camps in Guantanamo Bay? What sort of chat will happen between Centrists and the Right-Wing with banning abortion? How about the rights of people transitioning? Because from what I'm seeing, they seem awfully okay with it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 23 hours ago

See all, but understand nothing.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, bluesky isn't the fediverse, but the point stands.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

You're correct. But blue sky does support federation, just not the same protocol as the fediverse, right?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago

Federation with what?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm ignorant af tbh 😅 Thanks for the clarification

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 15 minutes ago) (6 children)

It sort of depends on how you define fediverse. If you mean things using the ActivityPub protocol and are federated with Mastodon, Lemmy, etc. then no, it's not part of the fediverse. If you mean anything using federated technology then you could possibly include it. https://docs.bsky.app/docs/advanced-guides/federation-architecture It uses something called AT instead of ActivityPub. I'm not personally aware of any other services or instances using it, but I also didn't look very hard.

Edit: I learned that the term AT Protocol uses for their version of fediverse is "atmosphere". So I wouldn't necessarily say it's part of the fediverse, but the context of the usage matters.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

Bluesy is a business, Mastodon is a community tool that runs on the ActivityPub (same as Lemmy which is what we are talkin on).

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago

I think Mastodon would be what you're looking for.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›