this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
328 points (88.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

5714 readers
3968 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

well, they might have switched to the gold standard

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Hmm. Is money the weapon of mass destruction that will lead to the end of the world?

[–] [email protected] 78 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Why is misinformation from 2003 being spread again? American soldiers did seize a lot of gold but that but that gold was not taken from Iraq. It was given to the new Iraqi government.

2003 article about the gold. Edit: replaced link with a more detailed article.

Some of the "gold" wasn't even real (paywalled).

Government Accountability Office report.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 8 months ago

Some of the "gold" wasn't even real

I sort of guessed this. I mean, I might be wrong, but that one dude is holding — with one hand — what looks like a bar that's about 1.5-2 liters in size at least. Meaning like ~60kg (~130lbs).

Ofc I'm waaaay eyeballing it and might be wrong, but either those guys are stronger than they look or that's not gold.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

Not going to lie if I was there I would've had to pull a Huel

[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm still surprised they didn't find any. Not that I think Saddam actually had them, but I thought they'd find them anyway.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I'm honestly surprised they didn't find at least some squirreled away. Don't forget they had an active programme till 1991. Used them in the 80s. You have that many weapons, you'd expect to forget a barrel or two somewhere in a shed.

Means the UN destruction of what remained and regular inspections were actually thorough. IRC the Iraqis also claimed they'd destroyed some on their own, which apparently wasn't a lie.

Or perhaps they sold what they had left. IRC there were reports of a lot of transports to Syria before the war broke out. Would explain where Syria got (some of) its chemical weapons from.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Well some of them were used against the Kurds, possibly the Marsh Arabs as well.

Still surprising there was nothing left though.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean... if they did find any chemical weapons sitting on them and taking selfies might not be a good idea.

Just saying.