this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
710 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

58144 readers
4502 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

This is already publicly available data. You can get the address of every private pilot and the tail number of every plane from the FAAs database right now. Additionally you can see where every flying aircraft is in the world right now. Kind of a nothingburger :/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Gonna get downvoted for this: Doxing isn't cool.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Doxxing normal people isn't cool. Doxxing people who own climate damaging transport.... I'm not against.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

This is all public info anyway but a 100hp plane someone built in their garage for less than the price of a new Tesla isn't the same as Elon's jet fleet.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

they also have the money to protect themselves from doxxing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

~~Tax~~ Eat the rich!

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago

Poor billionaires !

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Rich people deserve to suffer.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago (2 children)

2.5million people have private planes registered at just one airport? Man do I feel like a poor right now.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

No. 2.5 million people have used them. And not all private planes are fancy luxury sky-yachts.

For instance, a small prop-job used for flight training.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It's mostly landing/takeoff records. Big airports have takeoff and landing fees and would keep records such as this for accounting and legal reasons. Being a major airport like LAX means it's probably mostly private/commercial jets, but also plenty of small time hobbyist aviators are probably wrapped up in this, and would be the only victim here ( general aviation pilots tend to use smaller, local airports but still on occasion hit the big ones).

[–] [email protected] 95 points 6 months ago (3 children)

private planes, yachts, private chefs, etc seem like such an obscene amount of luxury it shouldn't be allowed somehow. public services would be better if the wealthy were forced to use them, then they might actually care about the constant shittifying of everything

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago (3 children)

"Private planes" may refer to a Piper Cub. It's expensive, but in some areas may make sense, and fits under a hobby. Some people dream of piloting.

"Yachts" may refer to a motorboat. Or a yacht as in "motorboat with one sail". It's expensive, but very often honestly worked for. Some people dream of yachting.

I'm just informing you of cases you clearly didn't think about.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Getting a private pilots license is a lot cheaper than I thought once I started researching it. The total cost of everything (school/instructor time/flight hours) seemed to average around 15k. Instead of buying a new car for 40k you could probably reasonably afford a pilots license and a plane share with a couple other people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Yes, and people do that. Which was my point.

There are still health requirements for a license and these are not a pure formality, I think.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

You're overthinking it. People who have it better than me are automatically bad, and all crimes are authorized against them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I was just looking at planes this week, can get an experimental one seater for like $30k.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I need the link.

(But - yes. I was still thinking of "real" planes, but I suppose there may be something flying for that cost. If you don't mean a glider.)

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Private chefs even? Really?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

it's kind of a stretch, yeah, but it just feels so gross, in that same way a yacht or plane does, seeing tiktok vids of someone laboriously crafting this gorgeous, perfect meal for one (1) fucking middle-CEO-partner-twat and his family. if you make enough to afford something like that, get fucked, you definitely don't work hard enough to deserve it.

it's probably a way easier shift for the chef than a restaurant dinner rush, which is great, but it's just...such an obscenity to think some have access to this sort of luxury because they shook the right hands at the business office / were born into generational wealth.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Apparently more people here agree than disagree.

I think owning a small plane is fine. I'm not officially against owning a larger plane... Idk..

Aviation makes up about 2% of global CO2 emissions which is a lot but also not a lot. It's not the smaller planes, it's all of the passenger and cargo jets (mostly).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

IIRC the biggest problem with that 2% is it's already in the upper atmosphere. Don't have a source for that though.

Here's a source for your comment btw:

https://ourworldindata.org/ghg-emissions-by-sector

which links to this paper (direct 296 kB pdf download link):

https://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/ICCT_CO2-commercl-aviation-2018_20190918.pdf

and aCKSHUALLYY it's 1.9%

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Oh dang my whole world is upside down now. Lol.

Thanks

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Anyone who has taken a cruise and is harping on jets is a hypocrite.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Thank you! While reducing CO2 is important, harping on private planes isn't going to make a change.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

That's like saying one person taking their bike to work instead of their car won't do anything, as if their car doesn't burn gas, as if they don't give money to oil companies for that gas.

The same idea with private jets. No matter how small a positive change might be in the grand scope of things, it's still a worthwhile change. That's really the one thing that has to happen so we all don't die; everyone making pro-environmental life choices that will eventually carry over into industry when that collective pressure accumulates, forcing companies that rely on income from those people to change their practice and policy.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

Added to the cool crimes list

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

2.5 million times "Taylor Swift" on that list

load more comments
view more: next ›