this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
113 points (88.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

33166 readers
1882 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They might also be meaningless internet points. Who knows.

(page 2) 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

If we don't have fake internet points, then how will we know what to think? Won't somebody think of the points‽ 😭

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

And we should keep it that way. As soon as you can derive value from your profile karma and/or it means something, it'll break any sense of earnest discussion some are trying to have in the first place.

Look at Reddit: any serious thread is peppered with might-be-funny one-liners in the hopes of catching some upvotes. This makes those threads harder to read through, although it does make for funny AI summary results.

It's not just off topic banter to increase karma though. It's also reposting old memes, jokes and stories that did well in the past to farm that sweet karma. Throw in some copied top-level comments too and some subreddits are basically perpetually living in déjà vu.

Let's not try to aim for that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've been able to exchange some of my points in the Lemmy Store for a rub on tattoo.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

rub on

( ͡ᵔ ͜ʖ ͡ᵔ )

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Even more fake here because you can turn off down votes

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure you can do that on individual subreddits as well. Do you mean on an instance wide level?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Admins have the option to disable it on a per instance basis.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Who will be the final boss in this battle?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not following you. I see your previous comment was in a thread about video game bosses though?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It’s ok, it was a bad and unrelated joke.

I was just suggesting that the Lemmy system was better than the Reddit system, but that there might be a better system than this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Lol that's an interesting thought. I wonder what it would be like if instead of simply giving upvotes and downvotes, you could rate every comment/post on a scale of 1-10 or something. It probably wouldn't work at all, but maybe there is some kind of system out there that would work better in the future.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Whoever has the most points on Lemmy has to read the credits in a style of Clive Anderson's choosing.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Whomever gets the most votes per month has to pay a share of the instance bill for the month

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Now this is democracy

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I just disable "show votes" in settings and that's it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Ooh, so they can also be invisible internet points.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

That just blew my mind, I didn't even realize that was a setting.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I hope Lemmy's internet points never become a thing people view as important. The way people act on Reddit to get a handful of up votes is embarrassing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is never counted as a total right? As long as it stays that way it shouldn't.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I've seen some front ends for Lemmy total it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Yeah it exists in the metadata, so certain front ends can display it and other platforms like Mbin and PieFed show it as a reputation score or something like that.

I think the way that Lemmy handles it is perfect, there's no reason to display the cumulative score and it definitely acts as a barrier to free and open discussion because people start censoring themselves and judging other users by their profile rather than the things they actually say.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I don't think it is in Tesseract or Alexandrite but I feel like I vaguely recall Jerboa, the mobile app, having it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

For those that don't know this is in reference to Reddit's process of "vote fuzzing". Most explanations online explain it as altering the votes to prevent things like rigging the vote or an individual going to someone else's page and down voting everything they've posted or commented. I think in reality it's more obtuse and erratic. I don't know if the level of "fuzz" varies based off the age of the post or the total number of votes.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I'll sell you mine. Hell, I might even trade some points for a block of your finest cheese.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›