Disagree. They need to learn to code. And be experts with AI tools.
Just like kids with a calculator.
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Disagree. They need to learn to code. And be experts with AI tools.
Just like kids with a calculator.
Isn't this basically "CEO of AI hardware company says that more people should use AI"? Not really news, since you wouldn't really expect him to say otherwise.
I know some Gen Z recent grads who use chatgpt to write their code.
back in my day, we had to write our code ourselves....
I use chatgpt for coding (millennial). You still need to know how to code though, because 50% of the time it doesn't work properly. You need to explain the nature of your variables, and the overall process you want to achieve. But I still save a good amount of time, because now I don't need to remember the specific syntax for a particular function, and it has saved me reading documentation because in can tell how some functions work by context.
Not learning how to code because of ai is like not learning math because there are calculators, sure, you don't need to know the multiplication tables by heart, but you need to know what multiplication is and how it's used to solve real world pringles.
i use chatgpt for coding (i can code myself but it helps with a lot of stuff), and if I wouldn't be able to code i would wonder why nothing works. but because i know how to code i know that chatgpt is often just writing horrible code which often does something completly else than asked. so i often think "screw this i do it myself" after countless trys to let chatgpt fix it.
Dammit, he actually has an engineering degree, I can't make snide remarks about business majors
Or can I?
"I have a foreboding of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time...when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues; when the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority; when, clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness..."
Carl Sagan, Astrologist/Horposcopist from ancient times.
I use LLMs daily to code but the more complex the issue is I try to solve the more work I have to do to get it to actually produce what I need. I feel like at some point we will get to where UML failed…it will just be easier to write the code.
But I don’t like writing long Linq queries or Angular templates or whatever, it does that quite well (70% of the time it is 70% correct or so). So it takes over the part of coding I dislike.
So no just being able to write code might be unnecessary but that’s like 10% of my day.
Writing single functions just isn't the hard part of programming in the vast majority of programs, the hard part is managing a project in a maintainable, robust, and extensible way.
If Nvidia driver quality goes down in the next couple years, we know why.
My God the stupidity goes to the top!
The man has a crippling spatula habit, he needs the income.
You still need the fundamentals. You still need to understand problem solving and debugging.
Yes, yes, keep my labour in high demand and my salary high
Kids should focus on the one thing AI can't do: Stand-up comedy.
Have you looked carefully at AI-produced code?