this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
1135 points (98.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

30848 readers
2975 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't feel like Orwell or Huxley are even close.

Orwell was about the party, we have a problem with Capitalist nihilists who aren't party specific. They'd be doing the same thing if Trump were a corrupt Dem (and he was for a while).

...as for Huxley, we live in a sexually repressed society nothing like Brave New World. The outlets aren't done collectively in church like structures, and there's no wild-man sanctuaries to escape to.

So no, neither of them present the model for the current circumstances.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don't think either were a perfect fit, but personally I don't think they need to be. V for Vendetta lines up great in some ways, much less so in others, but I think it scratches the same itch. They are all cautionary tales about the ways we allow or encourage or accept government use of power, and how those pressure points can be exploited to create various authoritarian and/or dystopian outcomes.

Been awhile since I've read any of those, but I definitely have always felt they resonate with each other, and IMO they resonate with current events also.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago

Honestly feels like we got the worst of both options. The petty censorship, puritanism and lies of 1984 mixed with the lesser and trivial entertainments of Brave New World.

I feel like especially in the last few years at least the part of the left that was so concerned with certain issues with problematic media and addressing issues with overly sexualizing women has joined in some unholy union with the prudish and moralists on the right to spawn a general censorship of a vast swath of concepts backed up by both the lefts moral high ground and the rights religious teachings.

Where before there was the nuance to recognize that women were too often presented as sexual objects in popular media, as well as the fact that we shouldn't kink shame consenting adults or the sex workers providing what should be seen as legitimate service. Now that nuance is lost in favor of simple discrimination and censorship, only disguised in the original movements language.

[–] [email protected] 112 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Nah.

Telescreens were mandatory.

In the real world, people would voluntarily install them, and pay for the privilage of doing so.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

....and they line up around the block to get the new ones that can see and hear them even better. Our timeline's version has access to our fingerprints, can identify our faces from millions of others, know our hobbies, our work schedule, our political leanings, etc, etc. We're deep in this nightmare.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Brave New Wolrd and Farnheit 451 with Handmaid's Tale...I mean, even Zuckeberg with Meta is trying to be the villain ceo of Ready Play One.

Edit: https://lemm.ee/post/53222800 These post is relevant to this discussion.
Specially the comment from [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Good callout to Fahrenheit 451. I think Beatty's monologues are pretty important because they're strongly argued. His positions aren't wholly irrational, he has given it careful, deliberate thought for a long time. The first time I read it I recall feeling compelled and almost convinced by his arguments, which is such a beautiful way to express it. Bradbury literally argues against the existence of the book Fahrenheit 451 itself, his own competing ideas that someone else would want to erase, through Beatty's monologues. He made a compelling argument for it, too. All the books disagree, so what even is truth?

Knowing how to be psychologically resilient against such arguments is important, I think.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 100 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Yeah, more like this guy was right.

Every day Huxley is proven more correct than Orwell because through the magic of SOMA (addictive phones hitting dopamine rushes), people can be surrounded with the truth and completely ignore it, and as you said, pay for the privilege of being lied to because it feels nice. (And oh man, that's a major industry on OnlyFans, being lied to because it feels nice)

Huxley understood our desires could break us more than our hate.

I can't find it, but I recall an interview with Zizek around when Snowden dropped his leaks, and it was about how it really changed nothing, and he was noting how the revelations of torture during the Iraq War had changed nothing either. He thought disclosure was a moot point now, society was checked out. He was right.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The “Amusing Ourselves to Death” comic does a good job showing how Huxley did a better job predicting the future.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It seems to me that they were both right. If I didn’t know better, I’d be inclined to think that the wealthy and powerful used their works as a roadmap instead of a warning.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›