this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
234 points (99.6% liked)

News

30898 readers
3115 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At least 2,145 senior-ranking NASA employees are set to leave under a push to shed staff, according to documents obtained by POLITICO — potentially spelling trouble for White House space policy and depriving the agency of decades of experience.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

Just, a little over 3 years from now, assuming we even have a different party take over, they'd have to spend years restarting/ reshaping/ recovering what was lost under this shitty excuse for an administration, the new guy'd be accused of 'not doing anything with the office'.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

We had an exe NASA employee who recently left for a better opportunity and she was awesome at everything. ....we'll be looking for a NASA person who might fit the bill.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I guess NASA's contribution to battery technology, satellite crop analysis and improved ventilators (that were used during COVID) weren't enough impact in the last couple years

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because who needs advancements that benefit all of humanity?

\s

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Well I sure as hell don't want no brown people getting them ben-ee-fits! - Some Stupid Fucking MAGAt

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

But we need to have more gas cars, climate change isn’t real, and COVID never happens just like Epstein Island so get that woke shit outta here NASA is a myth to protect the Jewish space chemtrails, obviously.

Checkmate libtard /s

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If any of those people are reading this, what are you going to do now?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Learn Mandarin and/ or french?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

If this news gets enough traction at Hacker News to reach the front page, you might have better luck asking your question there.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They'll probably go to the private sector, or land a job at a foreign space agency like ESA.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Oh wow the private sector hmm who could that be a gift to let me see

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I hope they continue their work in a country that deserves their contributions to the advancment of science and humanity as a whole.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

There is way more than that. I think 2900. They have until the end of the month to decide to take early retirement.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Why are we doing this? Government agencies shouldn’t be run like a company beholden to shareholders who supposedly want to pinch pennies.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Even worse, if it were, NASA would be the last place to cut.

NASA actually sees a return on investment.

You know, one of the modern problems is we aren't investing nearly enough public funds into R&D. Like 90% of 20th century American technological investment came from Bell Labs and public research.

Bell could invest a lot in research because they had money and weren't concerned with competition. One of the benefits of being a protected monopoly.

In retrospect, it'd be nice to have had the money without having the monopoly.

I don't know the numbers but I wouldn't be surprised if any FAANG is bigger than Bell was at its peak. But they aren't really monopolies to the level Bell was, so they keep most of what they develop and learn as proprietary/internal.

Edit to add: you know what country is putting a lot of public money behind R&D and subsidizing future industries? How do you think this will play out in 20 years? Chinas playing the long game and we are destroying decades of institutional knowledge for tiny quarterly gains. Absurd.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you saying monopolies drive innovation? I must not be understanding what you're saying.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Kindof? I guess that's a corollary. What I'm saying is that despite being objectively larger and more successful companies, they don't have nearly the innovation we got from the collaborative efforts of US (i.e. DARPA) and Bell's research.

It demonstrated that looking out on a very long timeline...decades, if not longer...and investing on projects that won't show any returns for just as long...if ever...but it can reap massive rewards for everyone.

But...capitalism...pure capitalism...only allows that through monopolies. Which of course is their own can of worms.

Regulated capitalism is just as bad, if not even worse, because there is no incentive for companies to work together on a long enough timeline for it to matter. It results in everything being measured on a quarterly/yearly scale and expecting immediate results, while also disincentivizing publishing or any other dissemination of knowledge

Hence it falls on the government to bankroll these things through grants.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was curious so I asked ChatGPT. The answer was surprising...all of them tower over Bell by nearly every financial measure...


Was Any Company Bigger Than Bell at Its Peak?

Short answer: Yes — by some metrics. But Bell was unique.


📡 Bell System at Its Peak

The Bell System (AT&T and its regional Bell companies) was a government-regulated telecom monopoly until its breakup in 1984.

  • Revenue (early 1980s): ~$70–80B/year
    → ~$220–250B today, inflation-adjusted
  • Employees: Over 1 million
  • Market Cap (est.): ~$100–150B in 1980s
    → ~$300–400B today
  • Market Share: ~90% of U.S. phone service
  • R&D: Bell Labs (invented transistor, UNIX, lasers, info theory, etc.)

In short: Bell controlled the entire U.S. telecom backbone and set the pace for global innovation.


🦷 Big Tech Today (as of 2025)

Company Market Cap Revenue (TTM) Employees
Apple ~$3.5T ~$420B ~150,000
Amazon ~$2T ~$600B ~1.5 million
Alphabet ~$2.5T ~$370B ~180,000
Microsoft ~$3.5T ~$300B ~220,000
Meta ~$1.3T ~$140B ~65,000
  • All exceed Bell’s revenue and market cap, even adjusted for inflation.
  • Amazon rivals Bell’s employee count, but largely due to warehouses and delivery.

🧠 Influence Comparison

Category Bell System FAANG & Friends
Revenue ~$220–250B (adj.) ✅ Yes (Apple, Amazon, etc.)
Market Cap ~$300–400B (adj.) ✅ Yes (multiple > $2T)
Employees ~1M ✅ Amazon (~1.5M)
Infrastructure Control National telecom monopoly ❌ No – rely on existing infra
Scientific Legacy Bell Labs (transistor, UNIX) ❌ Unmatched in corporate R&D
Monopoly Power Legally enforced monopoly ❓ De facto dominance (ads, data, AI)

🧾 TL;DR: Is Anyone "Bigger"?

By market value and revenue? ✅ Yes
By number of employees? ✅ Amazon
By influence on infrastructure, science, and policy? ❌ No — Bell was foundational

Bell wasn't just a company — it was the nervous system of American communication.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We all know why. Trump and his handlers (Thiel, Heritage, Musk, etc.) want to "reduce [the federal government] to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.” They want to privatize everything so that they can make more money off of these necessary services. It's always just been about the class war that the ultra wealthy have been perpetrating on us.

They need to face justice.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Putin above all of them too

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

They're being handled by enemies of the country and told they'll profit off the wreckage, that's why.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Too late. They are thinking like that. They’re for smaller governments. Who the fuck voted for this idiot? Nothing like idiot Fed Employees saying, “I DiDn’T vote FoR tHiS.”

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago

Those 2,145 employees, in turn, make up the bulk of the 2,694 civil staff who have agreed to leave NASA under a slate of offer

Sounds like civil staff was top heavy and voluntary separation packages were offered. Those that accepted and NASA also agreed on would've been redundant (or close to it) positions already.

If you couldn't get your project properly funded and found out $400M a year goes to legacy senior civil staff, you'd want them gone too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm taking the stance that Putins got some dirt on him, or he's being held hostage via assassins. We all saw how close he was assassinated. Definitely russian special ops with how precise that shot was. No way would anyone like him be able to get in normally without external help, and no one sane would try to dismantle the US Gov't from the inside. Notably he's doing it with such efficiency - can't be a moron & get into office AND be dumb enough to dismantle the govt like he is. BRICS even got Elon helping to take the govt down; and now they're forcing them to create a 3rd party to destroy the US political system...

...Or they're just fucking idiots

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

this is putins goal, destabalize the us agencies, so they cant concentrate on russian internal and foreign politics. gepolitics,

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, you have a shitty businessman as a leader. Has wrecked all his businesses and still running off daddies money with the MAGA grift. Not surprising sadly.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

It's literally muscle memory for him. So sad to see all of this being eroded before our very eyes.