this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
27 points (70.8% liked)

PC Gaming

11204 readers
732 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
27
AMD Says You Don't Need More VRAM (i.ytimg.com)
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
  1. Why would they be buying a new card to play how they're already playing?
  2. What does the long term trend line look like?

You can confidently say that this is fine for most consumers today. There really isn't a great argument that this will serve most consumers well for the next 3 to 5 years.

It's ok if well informed consumers are fine with a compromise for their use case.

Misrepresenting the product category, and misleading less informed consumers to believe that it's not a second rate product in the current generation is deeply anti-consumer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can confidently say that this is fine for most consumers today. There really isn't a great argument that this will serve most consumers well for the next 3 to 5 years.

People have been saying that for years, my 8gb card is chugging along just fine. The race to vram that people were expecting just hasn't happened. There's little reason to move on from 1080p and the 75+ million ps5s aren't going anywhere anytime soon.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's no NEED to move on from 1080p, but there are a lot of reasons.

I wouldn't even object to his position on 1080p if he said "the RX 5700 is fine for most users, don't waste your money and reduce e-waste".

He's telling consumers that they should expect to pay a premium price to be playing a slightly better than 2019 experience until 2028 or 2030. There are gullible people who won't understand that he's selling snake oil.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's telling consumers that they should expect to pay a premium price

What exactly do you expect him to say? Get the same GPU, but with more vram, at no extra cost?

If you want more performance, you pay more, that's the way it's always worked, and he's correct in that 8gb is good enough for most people.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

No, I expect him to gaslight naive consumers. Which is what he did. I just don't get why others are defending it.

In this case, at 1080p it's barely more performance for a lot more money. And if we're falling back on "good enough for most people" then an RX 5700 or 6600 is also "good enough for most people".

It's a free market, he can sell a low value product to suckers. That's his right. You're free to defend him and think it's not scummy. But it's scummy, and hopefully most people who know better are going to call it out.