this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
729 points (98.8% liked)
196
17795 readers
388 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've never understood this reaction. Goofy and Pluto are both dogs in the same way Humans and dogs are both mammals. They're not the same, just visually similar, but Goofy has more in common with Mickey than Pluto.
Ok, but a dog's a dog. So in the case of pluto, it's either a disability or pet play. Pick your poison.
Neither, he's just a dog. Is your (hypothetical) real-world dog disabled? Is your dog engaging in kink? No, it's just a dog, and we've generally accepted that it's ok to own/adopt one into your home.
Is a marmoset that is owned/adopted as a pet by a fellow simian human somehow mentally disabled or engaging in pet play? No, it's just a monkey, and sometimes they're pets.
Just because a human and a marmoset are both simians, both primates, doesn't mean we treat them the same. The same is clearly the case for Goofy, Mickey, and Pluto.
There's a lot of examples of non-personified cartoon animals in those comics and cartoons, typically in the background. It's just how the world works, animals owning animals, just like us.
So if I own a human as a pet, that's cool? Two humans in this universe is the same as two dogs in that one. A marmoset isn't a human. It's not a proper comparison. If you see a human being led around on a leash in this universe there are two options. Usually in cartoon universes mammals are anthropomorphic and birds and fish are not but if you have a universe where dogs are anthropomorphic and one of them is being led around on a lead, that's not right.
But they're not the same, that's what I'm getting at. One of them is a man who walks and talks, and the other is just a cartoon dog. Idk why that's so hard to understand.
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.