Slop.

520 readers

369 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 6 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

[cw transphobia] "Sure theyre trans or whatever" (hexbear.net)

submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

what does this even mean? zero investigation terf-vibes-based analysis has ruined discourse forever wtf

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Sometimes I wonder if these kinds of views could be addressed with them simply meeting a nonbinary person?

I typically just call myself queer as opposed to nonbinary but I'm an amab on E for 4 years. I dress in comfortable clothing (usually an oversized mens shirt with whatever jeans or leggings I have). Fuck, I don't even shave regularly these days and I still get hit with fem identifiers whenever I go out. Surely I'd be "trans enough" for this person right?

If her line is just supporting needs, then she'd still be supporting my ability to get hormones right? She'd still be supporting the needs of nonbinary people who choose to get gender-affirming surgeries right? At that point, it just seems like a pointless gatekeep. "Oh you don't need any kind of medical treatment? Fuck you!" Huh? Why? What does this accomplish?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

unclear if scum even know about NBs getting gas.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If her line is just supporting needs, then she'd still be supporting my ability to get hormones right? She'd still be supporting the needs of nonbinary people who choose to get gender-affirming surgeries right? At that point, it just seems like a pointless gatekeep. "Oh you don't need any kind of medical treatment? Fuck you!" Huh? Why? What does this accomplish?

Yes. She would consider you a transsexual nonbinary person, unlike all those non-transitioning enbies she thinks are sucking up all of the activisms or whatever.

This is some real 2010s-ass discourse.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

The obvious solution is clearly to transition everyone feinberg-sicko cissues