videos

The problem is that Destiny fundamentally lacked the required knowledge to engage in any kind of meaningfully relevant discussion beyond himself conceding immediate defeat. There's no "debate" to be had of any value, Destiny could never hope to add value as he lacked sufficient knowledge. Despite this, he still tried to argue against Finklestein, who does know about the subject to a far greater degree.

Among Communists, there is a saying:

No investigation, no right to speak.

It is far better to hold your tongue on matters you do not know until you have done the necessary legwork to learn. Otherwise, you contribute to a cacophany of misinformation.

Debates as the modern liberal bloodsport are based on "owning" the other party. Winning the argument matters more than coming to a higher understanding, ergo it's a space dominated by the most annoying types of people (like Destiny). "Holding his own" doesn't matter in the slightest unless you value winning the argument over being correct.

If you want to be more educated on a subject, it's far more effective to spend that time reading. Books exist for a reason. Debates are for entertainment, not education, unless they are held among principled comrades wishing to come to a unified consensus on matters key to principle.

Side note, liberalism is a bad thing. This is a Leftist community, Destiny is rightfully hated here as a genocidal zionist liberal. Just a heads-up.