this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
-2 points (0.0% liked)

World News

32282 readers
788 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If we're going to get more of this content, should we have a separate community discrediting stories from large and/or state media sources?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

One comm for state propaganda and the corporate media that repeat it, and separate, partitioned free speech zone comm for any criticism thereof?

In the second gulf war, when the State and the corporate media pushed the weapons of mass destruction narrative—which also didn’t pass the sniff test—would you have wanted any push-back on that narrative kept out of the conversation?

Stephen Colbert at the White House Correspondents' Dinner

But, listen, let's review the rules. Here's how it works. The President makes decisions. He's the decider. The press secretary announces those decisions, and you people of the press type those decisions down. Make, announce, type. Just put 'em through a spell check and go home. Get to know your family again. Make love to your wife. Write that novel you got kicking around in your head. You know, the one about the intrepid Washington reporter with the courage to stand up to the administration? You know, fiction!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We don't have that The Guardian article posted in this community. Why are you disproving an article that required no disproving?

Media misconstrues facts, makes factually incorrect statements, and spreads biases. We already know this. This screams of picking up a piece of shit, being surprised that it's a piece of shit, and writing an article about it. The easier solution would have been to not pick up the piece of shit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

You are going on the assumption that Cook is only talking about this one Guardian article, when what he is doing is using that article as the jumping off point to address the entirety of the Israeli State & corporate media narrative about these rapes.

Jonathan Cook is no idle media critic; he is an expert in this field.

Jonathan Cook is a British writer and a freelance journalist formerly based in Nazareth, Israel, who writes about the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Yeah, fair enough. Article stays up.