badposting
badposting is a comm where you post badly
This is not a [email protected] alternative. This is not a [email protected] alternative. This is a place for you to post your bad posts.
Ever had a really shitty bit idea? Joke you want to take way past the point of where it was funny? Want to feel like a stand-up comedy guy who's been bombing a set for the past 30 minutes straight and at this point is just saying shit to see if people react to it? Really bad pun? A homemade cringe concoction? A cognitohazard that you have birthed into this world and have an urge to spread like chain mail?
Rules:
- Do not post good posts.
- Unauthorized goodposting is to be punished in the manner of commenting the phrase "GOOD post" followed by an emoji that has not yet been used in the thread
- Use an emoticon/kaomoji/rule-three-abiding ASCII art if the rations run out
- This is not a comm where you direct people to other people's bad posts. This is a comm where you post badly.
- This rule intentionally left blank.
- If you're struck for rule 3, skill issue, not allowed to complain about it.
Code of Conduct applies just as much here as it does everywhere else. Technically, CoC violations are bad posts. On the other hand: L + ratio + get ~~better~~ worse material bozo
view the rest of the comments
Yeah that’s making sense to me now that I’ve almost finished the introductory material lol. Just surprised me seeing the phrase within the first couple pages. I’d literally had no idea of what the political dynamics of the early century Italy (or general Europe outside of WWI); I thought Mussolini just fell out of a coconut tree
🌴
Also figures like Ivanoe Bonomi (Also a social democrat since he was thrown out of the socialist party for publicly disavowing anarchist violence against the monarchy) who were initially supportive of fascism until it came for them personally, and then after the war was over immediately sought to re-establish bourgeois power, played a significant role in the development of Italian social democracy.
Ironically Mussolini's communist credentials prior to the establishment of fascism meant that when the fascists initially started to make waves, some members of the destra storica (Historical right) were more eager to oppose him than many liberals and softer left wingers based purely on vibes (This ended once he actually took power), and would have done so through force of arms were it not for the king's personal endorsement of fascism. This isn't a defense of the right btw, they eagerly became participants in the fascist movement, and many of them had used fascist blackshirts as strikebreakers.
Mussolinis past as an anti reformist communist is also why he attracted people like Bombacci (The "Super traitor". One of the founders of the Italian communist party, who until the end preached of Fascism's revolutionary promise) and De Ambris (Author of the fascist manifesto and personal friend of Gabrielle D'annunzio and probably one of the most important figures in the history of Italian syndicalism) and received the pseudo-endorsement of people like Bordiga (Patron saint of leftcoms).
Yeah the rapid progression and capitalization on opportunity really drives home the difference of bourgeois and working class interest and the means pursued to meet those. Im interested to read more about Gramscis developing views and later rejection of nationalism wrt sardinia vs mainland. And more about the coalescing of agriculture, manufacturing and fascism (ie fiat).
Idk something about nationalism, isolationist industry, and the willingness of centrists to willingly hand over everything sounds oddly familiar 🧐
I’m almost glad I didn’t get any sort of liberal education on this in high school/college, so I can try and parse this from a more materialist lens than whatever I would’ve been taught via houghton-mifflin