this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
991 points (98.6% liked)
People Twitter
7030 readers
767 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A bullet would have to actually hit the ear for what you describe. But I guess you have a vested interest in not at least trying to understand this.
You understand that the space-time we inhabit, or at least I do, has a very high resolution? The bullet can be any distance at all from the ear as it flies by.
Is this clear?
Yes, I understand that a bullet would have had to actually hit him for it to cause a bullet wound. Which he clearly did not have given how minor it was and quickly it healed. And that he hid the real doctor's report.
It grazed him. What is difficult to understand here?
I understand what they're claiming. That, however, is not what happened. You don't need to get a second doctor to "corroborate" the nature of your injury if your story is true. The first one would have been fine. But they hid that.
And the injury clearly wasn't bad enough to need actual extra consultation.