technology

23765 readers

161 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

China's humanoid robots will not replace human workers, Beijing official says (www.reuters.com)

submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Deepseek does incredibly far more harm than good. It accelerated the progress and view of what models are capable of and while Open Source paradigm is good fundamentaly, it is not in fact a good thing to give more tools and weapons for our enemies

it does not. AI existing doesn't make it good or bad, which is the premise of your argument, and i don't agree with it at all. and an open source model is far better than a closed source model owned and controlled by my enemies. open source models democratizes the AI, and gives control to the workers far more than the "enemies".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

AI existing doesn't make it good or bad

Ok so we have nothing to talk about, you are purposely forgetting how AI models were created in the first place just to argue. Yes talk about democratization of AI when both US and the rest of the world completely skipped over the moral argument over AI training without consent. None of this AI would exist if "democratic" principles were even relevant in the first place. We failed the moral guideline check on the very first hurdle already.

All you're saying is workers need to take yet another L and compromise, "hey we know this is all built without your consent and with stolen data but hey AI is here now so maybe its not that bad if we promised not to do something even more evil with it."

Your initial proposal was AI under a socialist system. Yeah I have better dreams to put myself to sleep.