this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
28 points (91.2% liked)

worldnews

2257 readers
31 users here now

Welcome! This community is constantly upgrading and is a current work in progress. Please stay tuned.

/c/[email protected] strives for high-quality standards on the latest world events.

The basis of these standards comes from the MBFC, which uses an aggregate of methodologies, including the IFCN and World Freedom Indices, to rate the Bias and Factual Reporting of News.

These are non-profit organisations with full transparency of their funding and structure. Likewise, this community is also transparent – Please feel free to question its staff and the overall content of this community.


Does your post fit the standards? Check this thread!



Rules:


Disallowed submissions

Commenters will receive one public warning with only one strike if violating any of the following rules:

Thank you.

todo list:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Wow. Did you just compare drunk driving by choice with having one's life endangered and completely left with no choice?

And you were preaching about the value of life? What a joke.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I did: your argument that mental state and the situation surrounding the use of human shields was critical to their morality. I lampooned it.

Left with no choice? The article calls out specific uses of noncombatants as impromptu ablative shields and bomb squads, but the well equipped IDF "has no choice"?

I'm failing to find any mention of the value of life, though...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Shooting the human shield is also bad.

In case I wasn't being clear, I was refering to the Palestinians who are left with no choice but to shoot back.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I think they are talking about the instances of the IDF shooting the human shields and then the Palestinians they were targeting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Using a human shield is a choice. I think they were making the point that what you said is garbage justification for using a human shield.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was refering to the Palestinians, who had to defend themselves.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Then I think the other person and I both misunderstood. It looked like you were defending Israel's use of human shields.

I still won't justify using a human shield.