this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1848 readers
16 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
1
Shocked to hear ‘prompt engineer’ is not a real job (pivot-to-ai.com)
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

video version

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sexy woman coded, perhaps, unless you’re saying that women who don’t have prominent breasts and what appears to be makeup aren’t real women

Why are you conflating “real”ness with sexiness?

But this is a drawing of a machine. Machines don’t have gender, biological or social or otherwise.

This is actually incorrect. Gender is a social construct. Anything can have gender if (a) society agrees upon it.

Whoever created this image thought, consciously or not, “I’m going to make a picture of a robot, and I’m gonna make it a sexy woman robot.” Not just a “woman-coded” humanoid robot […]

You have not proved this.

because that can be done without playing heavy on the sexiness, right?

Again, the image is not particularly sexy. Just having large breast-analogs in the picture doesn’t make it sexy, unless you’re a stereotypical teenage boy.

So why? Why make a sexy woman robot? I ask again: Am I supposed to want to fuck it?

You have not earned the right to ask these questions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

here's another version of the same sketch

now what could the symbolism here mean, why all these choices

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

I don't get it. It's like you're saying the sexy robot woman is a representation of seductive futuristic promises of a problematic technology. I don't see how that ties into the article at all.