this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
35 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

2164 readers
272 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good that they mention burner phones. But baffling that they don’t mention and explain BFU state, and how it’s the most secure power-on state your phone can be in.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

BFU and AFU doesn't matter if the authorites don't obey laws.

You can refuse all you want, they'll just jail you for refusing.

The UK already jail people for refusing to unlock their devices. Now with a president of the US who does not respect the rule of law, the same, or worse, will happen.

Just don't have anything political on your phone, let them search all they want, there's nothing there.

Keep any such materials on a Non-US cloud account, in encrypted format, without any personally identifiable information on that account. Hopefully you access them through VPN/Tor to make it difficult for them to determine the existence of such accounts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

I was more talking in terms of opsec and device security, but yes, that’s true in a legal sense