this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
20 points (85.7% liked)

Public Health

633 readers
44 users here now

For issues concerning:


🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link ([email protected])


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

From the study:

A total of 4,636,628 relatively healthy adults aged ≤50 years: 93,267 (2.01%) cannabis-users and 4,543,361 (97.99%) non-users. Cannabis-users were older (26 ± 8 vs 21 ± 9.5 years, P < 0.0001) and had higher comorbidities, including a nearly 15-fold higher prevalence of DD (30.63% vs 1.88%, P < 0.01) and BMI >30 (18.72% vs 3.25%, P < 0.0001). After PSM, each group had 89,776 patients with balanced demographics and baseline health characteristics.

Just ignore the 5 year age gap and 6x the rate of people with a BMI over 30...

Surely neither of those are gonna effect heart health or anything. /s

They could have narrowed down the control sample to line up with the cannabis user demographic, and then we could have gotten actual useful data out of this.

We still will if a rational person gets a hold of it and actually controls for confounding variables, but that's not gonna grab many headlines.