this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
1011 points (99.3% liked)

World News

46346 readers
3090 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/29061644

We’ve done it, we got rid of another soulless right wing politician!

Peter Dutton first made his party lose this election and now also lost his own seat much like Pierre Pullover

We’ve still got a government that green-lit new coal power plants in it’s last term, screwed over the Aboriginal community with a poorly run referendum, and still doesn’t give a shit about climate change, but baby steps hey.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We have a basic rule that the headline must match the article. Current headline reads:

"Peter Dutton to leave Coalition leaderless, conceding he has lost his seat of Dickson"

I'll give you a fair shot to correct it before just removing it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Done. Only because I respect you.

It doesn’t make sense that rule. But you’ll disagree anyway and there’s never a chance of winning a mod argument anyway.

The article headline you want is pointless and meaningless to the 99% of the world who visits this.

Peter Dutton to leave Coalition leaderless, conceding he has lost his seat of Dickson

I added context and a little bit of juice to it so it would make for a better headline for non-Australians. Did I add some anti Trump sentiment? Sure. Did that misconstrue the content of the article? No.

I understand the current rule makes it easy to mod the place, but it also means you don’t let the OP add context for Lemmy. The rule should be: you can’t misconstrue the content of the article.

Anyway, I appreciate all you mods do and I respect the rules that are in place.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

Your original headline was better. New one makes no sense to me M

[–] [email protected] 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks @[email protected] ! I know the rules are a pain, but really it helps prevent shitposting. Imagine coming into a community and just seeing variations on "xxx is a dumbass/shithead/etc. etc." all the way down. :)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago

All good. Thanks for all you do around here!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm curious what your headline orginally was

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

You can see it in the crosspost

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Ty! Makes a bit more sense as it does give context. The 'booting to the curb' was a bit editorialized. But if like me, you have no idea who Dutton and Dickson are it's a lot clearer.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I disagree.

Not modifying headings is a fairly universal rule.

Making it "easier to mod" is an understatement. If you let people "adapt titles to be more suitable for lemmy" or whatever you did, then you'll spend all day having arguments about what adoptions are appropriate. It's unworkable with volunteer mods.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's so pathetic that the top comment chain is discussing this pedantic issue instead of the actual article. Thank god for this moderation or my experience may have been slightly degraded.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's a pretty fundamental aspect of content aggregators. If posters editorialise the articles they post it becomes an echochamber for a very confined range of opinions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 minutes ago

Didn't say moderation isn't necessary, it is. What I said is it's sad the top comment chain is about moderation.

I opened this post to read comments out of curiosity, I still don't even know the context of this article because the top comment is about the title which I find sad.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Counterpoint. I posted an article from the Australian national broadcaster. They have their flaws but they aint breitbart.

While I sensationalised the title and added my 2 cents in the original OP I cross posted to this community, I linked to a nice source and created a more world context friendly title, yet far from disingenuous click bait.

The upvotes and the comments are largely based on that.

What this rule is currently accomplishing:

  • people will just post sensationalist sources with clickbaity titles and questionable journalism
  • or people will create sensationalist titles for neutral higher quality sources and then the top comment is always going to be about this level of virtue signalling.

What’s the point of a community if these are the rules? You’re asking for bad sources and at best or you’re just a comment section provider for legacy media.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why has everyone started saying "counterpoint" all of a sudden. Every comment is a counterpoint.

Counterpoint. Hopefully people aren't idiots that upvote sensational headlines.

Counterpoint. Everything I already said.

Counterpoint. You could make your own community where people sensationalise headlines.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 31 minutes ago

Counterpoint: I haven't noticed that being a trend until this thread.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just remove it.

People who do this shit are actively making this place worse.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Lol "the people actually making content are the problem" y'all are fucking clowns.

Can we just be loose with the moderation while the "top" posts don't even get 2k upvotes.

It gave lemmy content, it led to engaging discussions, who tf cares if the title is bad.

Jesus Christ I don't understand this mentality

You've made 3 posts in 2 years, op contributed to more fediverse in a day than you did in two years.

You really want to make this place better, then quit your bitchin or contribute more and your bitchin will be more understandable

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Editorialized titles distract from the content. There’s enough crazy ass shit happening globally that the added sensationalism isn’t necessary.

Either way, maybe calm down a bit lmao.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 minutes ago

maybe calm down a bit

While my tone wasn't cordial it also wasn't ALL CAPS SAYING KYS

You may be projecting a bit?

Regardless I've seen this garbage take on lemmy enough that I'm not going to politely point out the fault. I'll check their Lemmy contributions and call them fucking clowns if they are saying silly shit like "remove content me no likey for pendantic reasons" while contributing nothing to posts.

It's alotta reddit entitlement and I will attempt to call it out when i see it and I'm not going to be pleasant about it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

If you take an article title directly from a local newspaper and post it verbatim on World News, nobody will know what the fuck it's about and regardless of its content, it won't see the light of day. It's important that the article title is relevant to the audience.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 53 minutes ago

Okay, provided and example of this.

Jfc, it’s like I’m talking to kids lol.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At your service.

That’s what I thought about you when I read your message.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Man fuck em, thank you for adding to the fediverse OP! You should look at non .world communities. .world is the more shitty instance filled with "um actually......" Style users and mods