Behavior rules:
Posting rules:
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
And their planes made with scrap parts are still flying around.
Edit: A lot of new .world users showing up with ChatGPT responses about how this was a conspiracy, reminds me of an article i read this week.
https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/657978/reddit-ai-experiment-banned
So what now we like conspiracy theories when they suit us?
No shit, Sherlock. Always have. How does this surprise you?
Chat,
Did the Boeing whistleblower who deliberately told his family and friends that he wasn't suicidal commit suicide?
Suicidal people lie about being suicidal.
That's like the first thing you learn Suicide Awareness.
Do suicidal people reach out to their freinds and family to specifically tell them they aren't going to commit suicide and nothing else?
You're not going to be able to push your narrative here.
Suicidal people lie about being suicidal. And yes, they do reach out to friends and family.
It's also important to note here, John Barnett was not giving any sort of testimony that could harm Boeing. That's not what the trial was over,
No, the trial, or rather the appeal, was over Boeing's retaliation against John Barnett for his past whistleblowing. Whistleblowing that resulted in Boeing receiving a fine.
That particular case was done and over. John Barnett had nothing more to add.
John Barnett sued Boeing for the wrongful termination, and other retaliation including Blackballing him (talking to other Aerospace companies to make sure they wouldn't hire him), John lost the court case to Boeing's high priced lawyers.
John then appealed, and gave testimony in court in front of the appeals judge.
I don't know if you've ever been at a low point like that. Where you think you've hit rock bottom, and you hinge your hopes on just one thing going right, only for it to go horribly wrong.
I've been to that false rock bottom, and found the depths hidden below it.
Boeing didn't need to hire some contract killer to pull the trigger.
John Barnett was fighting his wrongful termination for seven years. That's how Boeing got John to pull the trigger. They drove him to suicide, didn't need to go any further.
That's what you conspiracy nuts miss. Boeing ruined a man's life, and that's the part that you're ignoring. Or maybe you heard someone rightfully say that Boeing killed a man, and you thought it was meant literally.
Well said thank you.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/20/business/boeing-john-barnett-lawsuit.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Dk8.yNQ6.TlGz67jKE6MN
His own family filed a lawsuit against Boeing that they were responsible for his death by causing his anxiety and depression. Is this the moral equivalent of murder? Probably. Is it the same as pulling the trigger? No. Why not? Because truth, and clarity in speech matter.
Do Boeings actions help deter future whistle-blowers? Yes.
Finding the correct label seems irrelevant.
It is absolutely, and I cannot state this enough, NOT irrelevant. Truth fucking matters.
Boeing was complicit in shortening a whistle-blower's life. FACT.
Do you actually know anyone suicidal? They usually don't tell people. They often don't know themselves. They changed their mind. They're depressed. They're anxious. They're not well. They die suddenly. Everyone is surprised. That is how it goes.
How often do suicidal people reach out to a bunch of their friends and family just to specifically tell them they are NOT going to commit suicide?
Literally all the time. Are you some sort of suicide expert?
Are you a bot?
I do have a real hard time picking all the squares with traffic lights in them...
That didn't happen. One grieving family friend said that he said that. John Oliver would have a field day with you people lol. Boeing has hurt and killed a lot of people. They do this like corporations do - by cutting staff, evading regulation, buying politicians. Boeing is liable for great harm. But focusing on these conspiracies rather than getting to the root of the problem -- that capitalism enables great harm by eroding our society -- isn't helping.
These conspiracies come as a direct result of capitalism. Everybody can plainly see when Boeing murders whistleblowers that it is because of money/their image.
Failure to talk about these conspiracies is a failure to point out the specific failures of capitalism.
Also I assume you actually meant conspiracy and not conspiracy theory.
So Corporations will break any law for profit besides murder?
I trust the guy's family more than the police lol, so do most people
You're really bending over backwards to push this narrative.
What "narrative"? It's on the Wikipedia page. It's not a narrative, it's what happened. Like... I really don't care that much about this specific case. It's more about the principle, the erosion of truth, the meaninglessness of facts. It's honestly the same type of thinking that makes right wing conspiracists and I don't want to capitulate to it. Focusing on a a salacious and improbable event downplays the real "evils" of capitalism, the smaller but cumulative things: the selfishness, the greed of everyday people and how profit motivated corporations enhance and multiply that. Contrapoints (Natalie Wynn) just did a fantastic video on conspiracies that touches on all three points. I would recommend it to anyone.
That's the thing. These events are not just "salacious and improbable". These events are actually happening in front of our eyes and they need to be taken seriously. These events are happening as a direct result of capitalism, and not calling it out will just allow the right to set the narrative on those issues.
I agree - corporations killing people 1) does happen and 2) is bad. But in this case, it didn't happen. I mean... You cant just go around making stuff up. If evidence comes out or is discovered later that shows different, then I will change my mind. That is scientific thinking. Because I don't have an angle.
You know what? Even though I disagree with this type of thinking, I can respect the empericist thought process.
Just because they masked evidence doesn't mean it didn't happen, though.
Not telling people is a heck of a lot different from being about to blow the whistle on a major corporation and telling people "if anything happens to me, it's not suicide".
How did "one family friend named Jennifer who can't believe it" turn into "all his family and friends"
What about tha other one a few weeks off from that one?
How are we supposed to keep track of all these Boeing whistleblowers suiciding themselves all over the place?
Let alone the ones they just maim.