this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
19 points (88.0% liked)

Canada

9549 readers
965 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Ya it's weird the illegal gun owner's will continue to ignore those bylaws as well. I really don't understand the liberals war on legal

Guns being regulated at the federal level is part of the reason Canada's gun laws are so much better than the US where it's regulated by county. So at least the ban doesn't break that.

It's already a felony to illegally possess a firearm. So banning legally acquired ones is effectively putting legal gun owners in the crosshairs of the law, punishing lawful behavior.

😢

Funding border patrol and cargo inspection is going to be infinitely more effective.

Although the real reason we have a war on legal gun owners is realistically it's impossible to curb the flow of illegal firearms and by going arfter legal ownership, the liberals appear to be doing something to stop the violence. It's performative, they also know most liberal voters aren't gun owners.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I really don’t understand the liberals war on legal

Because legal gun still increase the rate of violence in a society. Criminals also have easier time acquiring them when the supply chain for them is right there.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

How many criminals are running around with a hunting rifle stuffed in their pants?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Real strawman argument right there.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 hours ago

Youre the one claiming criminals are stealing legal firearms, the majority of which are hunting rifles. The vast majority of gun crime i read about is commited with handguns.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

They can ignore those bylaws, sure. But giving the police more tools and means to curb those illegal guns coming in is a good thing no?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Ya it is but banning handguns isn't giving the police more tools...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Criminals can steal handguns from legal owners...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Not really. Setting aside that atm the only legal handgun owners are the police/military, they have to be stored in a locked container anchored immovable to the home and their location known to the police at all times. IF someone broke in and somehow ripped the safe off the wall/open the minute the owner got home it would be immediately reported.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This is false. Before the ban RPAL holders could aquire certain handguns. They still had to keep them locked away 24/7 and inform the correct authorities if they ever moved it, like taking it to the range or changing apartments.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Considering those grandfathered in is too broad for the discussion because at that point someone somewhere has one still, no matter what we're talking about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This ban still happened recently. There are lots of "legal" handgun owners who are not military/police. There is also the grandfathering of guns as well as certain exsecurity like brinks workers, and positions like game wardens in the MNR. All these employees still had to get their training and lisenceing just like anyone else through the same courses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 57 minutes ago)

It's perfectly legal to own a handgun if you have an rpal.

The ban is on transfering ownership, ie selling one or gifting them.

So if you didn't already own one and have it registered with the rcmp, before the ban on sale. You can't legally get one.

What you might find interesting is police aren't required to get a PAL let alone an RPAL so technically police aren't legal gun owners. (Obviously they are exempted from laws surrounding carrying/possessing restricted firearms due to working in a "lawful profession" but they don't own the gun, and can't purchase them unless they also get a PAL/RPAL on there own volition 20 b)