Mildly Interesting

20059 readers

700 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

631

A emu egg (left) next to a cassowary egg (right). They are some of the largest bird eggs on the planet. (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

73 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If I had to guess it'd be the ability for oxygen to diffuse through the shell and reach the embryo?

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I got curious and your assumption is correct for one of the limiting factors.

Here is what I found:

The shell must be strong enough to support the egg’s weight and protect the embryo, but thin enough for the chick to break through when hatching.
As size increases, the weight grows cubically (volume), but shell strength only increases quadratically (surface area), so there’s a point where the shell would have to be too thick to hatch from.
The distance from the shell to the center increases.
Oxygen diffusion becomes inefficient, and the embryo could suffocate.
Larger eggs are harder to keep at a uniform temperature.
Birds incubating the eggs would need to generate and distribute more heat, which is physically demanding.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I think point two may be wrong. The strength of a shell should be proportional to its thickness, which would scale linearly with its size (assuming the shell got thicker in proportion to the size). There's definitely a point where a self supporting egg requires very thick shells like you said, but the scaling law you gave uses the wrong change.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

What's your sources? Begging your pardon, that looks like a perfectly standard GPT answer.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Appreciate the share, that's awesome info

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I never even considered that but it makes total sense. Thanks for the great post.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

No problem. I get curious myself so figure it nice to share with people that don’t tell me they’re not interested in useless facts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Didn't think I would find egg facts so interesting... Cool!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That’s eggcellent and I’m eggstatic that you enjoyed. Come back next Easter for more egg facts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Benedict!

I don't think I'm doing this right.