149
I ditched my laptop for a pocketable mini PC and a pair of AR glasses — here’s what happened
(www.tomsguide.com)
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
I think that some of the issue here is that the theoretical use case that these are designed around is not what the author is trying to use them for.
The author is looking for a monitor replacement.
These are augmented reality goggles. Like, the hardware is optimized to look at the world around yourself and then display useful information annotated over it, for which resolution is not critical. If we had data sources and software for that, that might be useful too, but right now, we don't really have that software library and data sources.
I think that Snow Crash did a good job of highlighting some of the neat potential of and yet also issues with AR:
Putting a rubber-band on brightness:
Highlighting hazards in low-light conditions using sensor fusion can be useful (current high-end US military NVGs do some of this):
Overlaying blueprint data can permit "seeing through walls":
A lot of the obvious stuff that one might display in AR goggles doesn't compete well with just showing reality in terms of usefuless:
Yes, and he's not wrong, as that appears to be the primary use case for these glasses. For full AR, you still need the Beam Pro, which costs half of the price of the glasses alone.
I do love Snow Crash (it was one of my favorite novels growing up), but I think Google Glass was probably much closer to that vision than these are. Personally, all I want is a big fucking screen fixed in space before me that doesn't make me dizzy when I look at it for more than 5 minutes, or wear out my neck muscles too much because the headset is too heavy.