this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)
Economics
1998 readers
70 users here now
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
nuclear strikes on a carrier fleet are an easy way to sink them. No civilian casualties. War doesn't have to be a fuck around process.
There's room for compromise on a greater cooperation agreement, especially with Vietnam. Philippines deserve destruction or overthrow of their corrupt US puppet.
China has a no-first-strike policy on nukes. It'll likely just use hypersonics
Only a feeble-minded person could believe that anyone could confidently use nuclear weapons against the United States and not face equal retaliation. The people would demand it.
Interesting theory that people would demand doomsday for some ships getting sunk. That people cannot accept the end of their empire's military projection. The US should then preemptively use nukes, with popular support, in any war they will fail in. Guarantee you that there will be no referendum on retaliation, only the usual media militantism and tyranny.
The MAD doctrine only gets invoked at the sight of several incoming missiles on territory. It is your response to navy being sunk that causes MAD.
And every major population in the U.S. would be annihilated in return. If China decided to nuke their own coast, America would either do nothing about it or come to a swift and total end.
Which is why your projection about nuclear weapons is just stupid. It ain't happening.