this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
86 points (93.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

11069 readers
152 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Transporting 200 people:

🚌 in busses (0:31 minutes)

🚋 in trams (0:32 minutes)

🚶 walking (0:38 minutes)

🚲 biking (1:59 minutes)

🚗 driving (4:08 minutes 😱)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

This graphic does not need pedestrians or bikes. They aren't competitive with vehicles of any kind when you start talking about multimile distances.

A more realistic simulation would be including the loading time for each vehicle type (car/bus/train) for a 5, 10, and 20 mile distance. That way you see how these vehicles are actually used rather than a shitty first past the post "race". Removing the loading/unloading times of each vehicle wildly skews it in mass transport's favor.

It would also be interesting to include usage costs associated with each mile range. I figure a bus pass for a 20 mile trip is a lot cheaper than loan payments, gas, and maintenance for a single passenger car ride.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No, bikes are competitive up to 8-10 miles in city traffic. And if traffic is especially bad for even longer distances.

I know it's only anecdotal, but my 5 mile commute is the same by bike or car, 15-17 minutes depending on traffic.

On the other hand the 25 mile ride to a friend's house takes 90 minutes by bike compared to the 30 it takes by car on the highway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Makes sense to me, the last time I did a long bike ride was over a decade ago. With my lack of cardio even a handful of miles sounds daunting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

Get an ebike to work your way back up. Start with full assist and you'll get some stamina pretty quick

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But this isn’t about speed, it is about space efficiency. The whole point is even taking speed into account, cars waste so much space per person that it takes them 2-8 times as long to make up for the space they take as any other mode of transportation.

I would also like to see parking lots shown for space visually at a location needed extra for those types of transport because that also is a problem.

If you’re worried about speed that’s not so much a visual, as an entire study on travel in a metropolitan area, including stuff like walking to metro, boarding/unboarding, walking to final location, heating up car in the winter, finding and paying for parking, traffic patterns, etc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

That's a completely valid point, with less cars there would be a lot more space with the lesser need of parking lots