this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
379 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2852 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) said Wednesday he would “absolutely not” vote for former President Trump over President Biden in November, pointing to Trump’s foreign policy views and his character.

“No. No, no, absolutely not,” Romney told CNN’s Kaitlan Collins on “The Source” when asked whether he would support Trump over Biden.

Romney explained there are “two factors” — policy and character — he is using to decide “who I want to have as the leader of my country and the person who is the example of the president for my kids and my grandkids.” He said are both vital but that character is most important.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 77 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What this tells you is that a man who spent a huge chunk of his life working for corporate cannibalization companies thinks that Trump would be so bad for the economy that even predatory corporations would suffer.

Its not like Romney ever had any actual policy positions based on anything other than political expedience.

'Course Republicans these days dont even seem to be pretending they have any coherent policy positions beyond 'we hate immigrants' and 'women dont deserve basic human rights'.

Bleck.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Romney's the former governor of Massachusetts, a very Democratic state. He's had fairly consistent policy positions for at least 20 years or so. On social issues he's pretty right wing, he's a Mormon after all. But, he was pro gun control 20 years ago and has been consistent on that every since. For abortion he said "I will protect a woman's right to choose under the laws of the country and the commonwealth", even though he was personally against it. He supported slightly raising the minimum wage, but vetoed a bill that substantially increased it. He admitted climate change was real and supported regulation of greenhouse gases, also supporting wind farms in MA.

Obamacare is basically Romney's plan for Massachusetts but rolled out to the entire country. So, on health care he was to the left of almost the entire Republican establishment, even to the left of many democrats.

Once the wind shifted with the whole Tea Party stuff and the Trumpization of the GOP, Romney didn't really shift. He didn't vote for Trump in 2016 or 2020. In fact, he voted to convict him in both of his impeachments. He marched with Black Lives Matter protesters. He still supports gun control, etc. Not only are these pretty liberal positions for a Republican, they're pretty consistent with his public life for the last 20 years.

Sure, he's a former private equity ghoul, but in public life it seems like he's more defined by his Mormon side than his private equity side. Yes, he's pro-business, he's definitely socially conservative, but he believes in the rule of law, and believes in US institutions.

I hate that I'm defending him. I don't like him. But, I do have some grudging respect for him. He's one of very few current Republicans who do seem to have principles. And, while I disagree with his principles, his principles are largely old-school Republican rather than new-school Fascist.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He's a good man that's wrong about some things. Trump is a shitty excuse for a human that's wrong about nearly everything.