this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
809 points (99.3% liked)

196

2686 readers
2327 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

I mean, here's a few random numbers out of my head: 1 9 5 2 6 8 6 3 4 0. I don't get it, why is it supposed to be hard? Sure, they're not "truly" random, but they sure look random /:

[–] [email protected] 37 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

You have one of each number except 7, and you're deliberately avoiding doubles and runs of consecutive numbers. Human attempts at randomness tend to be very idealized in that way, and as a result, less random.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Here's what my brain came up with

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 5

Crazy lucky, this probably would've spawned 3 extra ender pearls

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

My favourite example of this is that IIRC itunes pushed an update that made the shuffle feature less random because they were getting complaints about it not being random enough

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I bet the shuffle algorithm is sample with replacement.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

They may look random but arent truly random. Computers are terrible at it too. Thats why cryptography requires external sources to generate "true" random numbers. For example, cloudflare uses a wall of lava lamps to generate randomness for encryption keys.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago

That's so cool.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Here's another set of random digits

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

:3

After all, there's no fundamental reason for why it can't all just be a repeat of the same number. But it doesn't look random, right? So what is randomness?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

The most popular lottery numbers are 1,2,3,4,5,6 because we are human and don't understand randomness.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

There are 10 trillion ways to combine a sequence that long, so I think you would expect to see that exact sequence every 10 trillion digits of a randomly generated decimal sequence on average, which isn't that many to a modern computer, so almost certainly that has already happened by pure accident.

And randomness can be defined as entropy, which you check statistically. You can never be certain, you can only increase your level of confidence. Here is how random.org does it:

https://www.random.org/analysis/

And this shows you what some of those analyses look like in real time:

https://www.random.org/statistics/

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you're not joking, the fact you have no repetition/duplicates of numbers is a pattern that would make it easy to start to predict next number. Numberphile has nice demonstration of how predictable human randomness is, it's in the first 3 minutes of the video.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

792654349324138383027654826548192874651875306480462765726382

I don't know man, that's pretty random. I mean do you think you can predict the next numbers in the sequence just from the ones already there? Would have to predict the next batch, the way I made these come in batches. I can't exactly produce 1 number at a time from banging on my number-pad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

I am 99.8% sure that your sequence of numbers is not random. Your brain purposefully avoided repeating a digit. The probability of no repeated digits in 60 numbers is 1- (9/10)^60

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Here's some random numbers

8005882300

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Absolutely. And if you typed enough there would be enough information to tell if you typed that on a keyboard or phone, which fingers you used, and how you were feeling that day.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I can make an educated guess what numbers are most likely, yes.

For example, you have no repeat number sequences, so I can take a guess that the number 2 is less likely to be next.

Humans have certain tendencies that makes them want to make a number only seem more random. Also, you've probably seen those mentalists correctly guessing seemingly random stuff. Tells you enough how easily people are fooled into thinking something specific, so random can you actually be.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

you can just throw a coin x times and here you go true randomness and in convenient binary too

computers can't fathom our coin tossing abilities

though truth to be said it's more because we are just so bad at tossing coins. not even AI can predict the result of what will happen when we start to throw shit around

I bet it is even more random when you throw a coin while being inebriated.

Actually say random numbers when you are drunk shitless and they will be random. Checkmate

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Clearly you don't understand what the discussion is about, or you wouldn't give such an hilariously bad example.

Yes practically, predicting a coin toss would be very hard. But if you take every into account (gravity, wind direction, coin center of balance, etc) you can calculate the result, making it not truly random.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

lol good luck predicting my coin toss

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Noooo, you were just lucky this is impossible

It’s always heads here tho

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've got some more random numbers:

8 6 7 5 3 0 9 1 1 2 3 5 8 1 2 4 8 1 6 3 2

It's not that they look random is enough - They need to BE random.

Recheck your lava lamp Wall of Entropy and generate some real rands, scrub. (/s)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Jenny has to be so sick of those phone calls after ~40 years

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

:D. I have used this strip on multiple occasions.

It's a shame Scott Adams past work is tainted by his political statements.