this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5205 readers
648 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
1
The First Big Fight of the U.S. General Election Is Over LNG (Liquified Methane Gas) (heatmap.news)
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Archived copies of the article web.archive.org archive.today

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That's the industry version. I prefer to use 'methane' over 'natural' because it does a better job of telling people what it is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Super interesting. Just learned something. But I guess it makes sense. Branding it as natural probably sounds better. Thx

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

But that’s not even entirely true itself. You’re making things more confusing by adding unnecessary, redundant, and wrong misleading details. LNG is 85-95% methane, if it was pure methane it with be called LMG since it would be different than LNG.