CLAYTON — Two activists who participated in a pro-Palestine protest last spring at Washington University now face charges, the St. Louis County prosecuting attorney’s office said Wednesday.
Those charged include Jill Stein, the presidential nominee of the Green Party in 2024, who is accused of hitting a police officer with a bicycle and kicking him at the protest. Stein, 74, was charged Friday with first-degree trespass and fourth-degree assault.
In charging documents, Washington University police said demonstrators were given numerous warnings to leave the university’s private campus. Officers moved in for arrests around 8 p.m. Court documents alleged Stein interlocked her arms with other demonstrators and refused to leave.
In an interview with the Post-Dispatch just days after the protest, Stein disputed accounts that she struck an officer.
“While I was being assaulted with a bicycle, one of the police bent down and picked up my foot in order to try to further destabilize me into falling backwards,” Stein said. “And I wiggled out of his grip, you know, in an effort not to fall back on my head.”
honestly the dems were perfectly capable of losing the election all on their own, they really didn't need any assistance in that department
Point is, running third party is sabotaging the platform you claim to support. If you want something more effective, look at what's happening to Tesla right now.
Direct action is a different strategy from electoral politics. You need both.
The Dems platform is the facilitation of genocide of Palestinians. Good on Jill Stein trying to "sabotage" that
No, instead you pick the "no genocide" option. Quite telling that you'd pick "less genocide"
Only sensible thing u said so far
There is no chance Harris would have made the situation in Gaza even slightly better. This genocide is bipartisan.
But under Trump, Israel will become even more isolated. Mexico just recognized Palestine. Would that have happened under Harris?
Your daily reminder that blueMAGA don't care about what's actually happening in Gaza, only the domestic rhetoric their politicians use.
Trump is doing the same thing that Harris would do, the genocide is bipartisan.
You hear about these "new" proposals to expell the Palestinians? They were drafted in 2023! The reason Biden didn't attempt to do it is because no Arab country would accept 2 million refugees, and Trump will face the same obstacles.
The best option you have if you're playing by the rules is to pick the least bad option of the parties that can actually win, and then change that into the "no genocide" party.
We shouldn't be playing by those rules. That's how we got here in the first place.
Picking the least bad option is how we got the choice between genocide and less genocide in the first place
Are you sure you wouldn't be more comfortable on reddit.world?
What I'm saying is that voting third party does nothing, you either have to turn the democratic party into what you want, or scare the politicians(or rather, their owners) into getting rid of first past the post.
Alaska got rid of First Past The Post voting and now use Ranked Choice. What excuse does your state representatives have to not pass this critical reform?
So those unrepresented by their options in the voting booth can make and/or vote for outside the two party system without a spoiler effect.
So we can have democracy.
If you ever find yourself on a side that's pro genocide, you're the bad guy. There might be worse guys, but probably not. Being the team of 'well they're promising to not genocide me so let them have some genocide as a treat' does worse than nothing, and historically hasn't worked out so well.
If two parties are the pro genocide parties, then you logically cannot support either. It's worth voting third party to register your displeasure, while working towards other goals that will hopefully bring real change when the opportunity arises.
In any case nothing is ever solved or improved by genocide. So any option with genocide is the worst option among the infinite things you can attempt to do.
If you believe this then you have no idea what the conflict is or what has been happening in the region, pretty much ever.
We're the Germans genocided to end their genocide?
No, Israel is a settler state, Palestinians are the people that have got most of theirs homes stolen and have their country occupied.
Palestine is not an ethnicity based in religion, by example George Habash, cofounder of the PFLP, was Christian.
The dissolution of the State of Israel by force to end the genocide. But the solution that matters is the one that Palestinians agree among themselves.
Yes... They share the land. And it worked out great. Jews were safely living in Palestine along side Christians and Muslims for longer than any form of Israel ever existed.
It worked out fantastically, until a British Nazi and a group of white quasi Jewish people came up with Zionism and convinced the German Nazis and US totally not Nazis that it would be better if Jews all were forced back to Israel once and for all.
Until Zionism was invented in the late 1800s, it was unthinkable to have a Jewish state (since that's against the religion), and unthinkable to oppress the natives of the land of Palestine to make a Jewish state.
I don't think you know anything about the conflict. the Palestinians are demanding the right of return. they just want to go back to their homes and not be second class citizens. they're not demanding control of the land but of course they should be able to vote on everything their Israeli counterparts can.
so now you don't think this is a religious conflict, but anyone advocating for the Palestinians is doing so in bad faith? look, if you don't know something, you can just not say something.
Damn luckily the Democrats will not help Trump pass the budget. That would mean they work with Trump instead of the Greens.
What greens? They're not a real party.
So please, specifically which "greens" should the Democrats be working with?