this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
252 points (100.0% liked)

New York Times gift articles

732 readers
246 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My impression is that contrary to the headline, this isn't a young vs old thing, but a follows-the-news vs doesn't-follow-news thing

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Voter participation is low because every time people do turn out, they're reminded there are no politicians that will work for the workers.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

People haven't turned out. Voter participation is abyssmal. Just because you personally have not seen universal and positive change from your own vote immediately does not mean it can never ever work.

Voter participation is low because dipshits like you keep saying "See? Your life hasn't irrevocably changed because of this one election! There's no point in doing the absolute bare minimum! Better to sit at home and complain about how everything is broken and hope that someone else does something radical and meaningful about it!"

Maybe stop treating everything like a winner-take-all competition and realize that we won't see effective long term change except through repeated concerted effort where you keep showing up. Even if you see setbacks. We might actually achieve something.

But I guess if you'd rather give up because you haven't gotten what you want immediately, that's entirely up to you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

You will never get more than the 65% turn out of 2020. You just won't. Because when the Dems win, it's never enough. You never get enough, you never have enough, but the Republicans always have enough to get their legislation through, even as a minority.

Stop making excuses for oligarchs. It's pathetic.