Space

9996 readers

339 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.

Rules

Be respectful and inclusive.
No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
Engage in constructive discussions.
Share relevant content.
Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Use appropriate language and tone.
Report violations.
Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula

Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography

Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

NASA Cameras on Blue Ghost Capture First-of-its-Kind Moon Landing Footage - News Release, published March 13, 2025 (www.nasa.gov)

submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A team at NASA’s Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, has captured first-of-its-kind imagery of a lunar lander’s engine plumes interacting with the Moon’s surface, a key piece of data as trips to the Moon increase in the coming years under the agency’s Artemis campaign.

The Stereo Cameras for Lunar-Plume Surface Studies (SCALPSS) 1.1 instrument took the images during the descent and successful soft landing of Firefly Aerospace’s Blue Ghost lunar lander on the Moon’s Mare Crisium region on March 2, as part of NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) initiative.

Includes a YouTube video

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I didn't read the article, just watched the video. But my guess is dynamic interactions of the exhaust gases with the regolith. I don't think it's something there's much data about. Without a landing pad, a landing of a full Starship may be a risky business. Of course the landing thrusters on the tip should help a lot, but still. And now that I think about it, the launch from the surface might be worrying as well. We've seen what Super Heavy did to a robust concrete slab without a deflector. Starship is nowhere near that powerful, but regolith is no concrete, and you preferably don't want flying debris damaging your engines when you're trying to come back from the Moon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

what about leaving the bottom half of the lander as a launch pad? Isn’t that what Apollo did? The descent stage doubled as a launch pad. Grandpa engineered the separators for that part…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Well, the currently approved lander is a modified starship simply standing on some legs. Your solution would work, but it isn't what will happen during Artemis. Not with the money available (other options were much more expensive), and even if there was more money, almost certainly not under current administration.