United Kingdom

4332 readers

433 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Ban misogynistic online pornography, review to propose (www.bbc.co.uk)

submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Measures proposed in the review, commissioned by the previous government and led by Conservative peer Baroness Gabby Bertin, are understood to include making it illegal to possess or publish pornography showing women being choked during sex.

After her appointment by Rishi Sunak's government, Baroness Bertin made it clear she would not be approaching the topic from a prudish or disapproving position.

She will make 32 recommendations on what should be done about the "high-harm sector" of legal online pornography.

The review, due to be published later, is expected to argue that porn videos considered too harmful for any certificate in the offline world should be banned online.

Non-fatal strangulation is already an offence if someone does not consent but its depiction online is not illegal.

The review suggests pornography websites have normalised such behaviour in the real world, with violent and degrading material rife on mainstream platforms amid a "total absence of government scrutiny".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Is this going to be another thing like the porn law Theresa May pushed for? The one that made face-sitting, fingering with more than two fingers, "inflicting pain" (this was worded so vaguely that it could include things as mundane as spanking), bondage, and female ejaculation illegal?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, so the only good that will come of it are the protest photos and videos.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah seems like it. Gotta end net neutrality so the government can make sure we're not watching choke porn I guess.