this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

Reddit

13757 readers
6 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Something big is happening, as Reddit seems to have purged literally every NSFW sub they know. Reason is always "unmoderated" despite some of the banned subreddits being fully moderated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (6 children)

r/transgender_surgeries wasn't porn. It was a community outlet for results so people could understand what to expect. Queer folk always get swept up with porn, cishet only see us as a "kink" and assume our existence is entirely sexual.

It's fucking infuriating.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

You... see who's in charge, right? Republicans always target LGBTQ+ folks for "pornographic" violations.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

It's a shame. I'm not trans. I'm a cis male and I have no desire to be female. But I live in a very trans friendly community and as such I have many trans friends and they need outlets. I joined a meetup group which inadvertly became a trans safe space (original topic was anime) and many trans people just joined as it was the one space where they weren't judged. We just did it in the way of anime, like their only safe space is something not trans releated and this is despite living in a friendly city. I will be an ally to all my trans friends and support them in this time of need.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well it is genitals but the purpose is entirely different. I don’t agree with it but I can at least see the logic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

By that "logic", all obgyn's are sex workers. It's shit justification for bigotry and shouldn't be given any credence whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not sure I follow the logic since an OBGYNs job is not get you off.

If they are banning NSFW images, then that’s why.

Like I said the purpose of those images in the trans subreddits serve an educational purpose. But you probably shouldn’t be viewing it at work. If they are banning nudity, that’s nudity.

Like I said I don’t agree with the ban hammer, but it’s consistent. However, in my opinion, all it should be left as is regardless of the purpose.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

since an OBGYNs job is not get you off.

Neither is trans people posting the results of surgery.

This entire line of thinking is contradictory, nonsensical and unhelpful.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was replying to comment the “OBGYNs are sex workers” comment. Tran surgery pics are very useful and not porn.

If you can’t follow that logic I’m not sure what to do.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean, ffs. #notallcishet? I don’t get how people who are being oppressed and all lumped together under one description (which you all definitely are) can be so nonchalant throwing around broad strokes like that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You got a problem with trans people? No? Then it wasn't talking about you. Christ, is that hard to understand?

When a group of people makes an "us vs them" against a minority, it forces the minority to use that language back. As a cishet person, your identity is being used as a weapon to harm trans people regardless if you're doing anything. Ignorance of the minorities plight can be weaponized to do more harm and that ignorance can be shielded through appeals to normalcy and tradition.

When you respond to that language with "not all cishet people" you signal that your support is contingent on you not losing anything (your ignorance is one of the things you can lose). Which can and will be used to weaponize more harm against the minority group.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I realize that I’m outnumbered here and that this is apparently an unpopular opinion, but nobody is forcing anyone to say “all x are y” because someone else is (I agree, in bad faith) doing the same thing.

You’ve both been quite rude to me and I’m done engaging you, but that’s the full extent of my point and I’m unconvinced by your rebuttals.

Ciao now 🫡

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

nobody is forcing anyone to say “all x are y” because someone else is (I agree, in bad faith) doing the same thing.

Legal documents are being made to say that all x (transgender individuals) are now y (the wrong gender) because someone else (the government) is making them say so.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

I’ve never disputed that. I don’t know how reiterating that fact in any way supports the idea that it “forces” transgender individuals to use the same language to describe “all cishet” people.

That was my point. It always has been.

If I were visually impaired and protesting unsuccessfully for better accessibility in my work environments, I can’t imagine why I would make a claim in any capacity including the language “all sighted people”.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol was that hashtag ironic? You know "not all men" is frequently referenced as a critique about men who can't hear criticism of gender equality because "not all men"? As a cishet dude: calm down, their point is valid and your reaction is cringe

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Ludicrous. But fuck it. As you were 🙄

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm currently discussing with people about mirroring it somewhere on lemmy, but there is also Transbucket which already exists as its own independent website.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Queer folk always get swept up with porn, cishet only see us as a “kink” and assume our existence is entirely sexual.

This is the whole point of these porn bans is to remove queer people from the internet. The porn cover just allows it to happen. So whenever you see anything about porn bans think queer ban first and then some porn removal that comes right back

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The old ass fascists trying to hold together their plutocracy suppress anything that goes against their patriarchal values.

Even looking at it as a fetish, trans porn has been skyrocketing in popularity

https://www.pornhub.com/insights/transgender-searches

And this terrifies right wingers

The current patriarchy sees non-binary people as a threat to their heirachies. If the line between man and woman gets blurred then we start questioning why we aren't all actually equal, and that leads to us removing them from power.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Really anything that shows or hints that any part of their "natural" order is something created. Gender is a big one but anything

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

it's telling that they target trans content; but leave gay content alone.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Gay people are on the chopping block for sure, just a bit farther down

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They lost the chance to scapegoat the gays after they failed to in the 80s during the AIDS epidemic

Now there's too many gay people in the population to keep them down.

Once we get over this hurdle the same will be true for Trans people.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Now there's too many gay people in the population to keep them down.

Well if we made more gay people, let's just make more trans people. Problem solved!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 23 hours ago

let’s just make more trans people. Problem solved!

This is literally what right wingers accuse trans people trying to engage with kids in public of doing. Like trans story time, or trans teachers. That they're going to trans their children, like it's some kind of vampire curse.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm doing my part ;3

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They knew that their attacks on gay people weren't as popular as they once were so they are taking the exact same tactics and language and moving it towards Trans people. It both predictable and sad at the same time

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

it's sad, but expected from conservatives; the real sadness is an "ally" like biden who didn't enact the equal right amendment that would help protect trans people from the legal version of this shit and then very publicly pretended that he did.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why are people still talking about Biden? He's not the president and I thought we all agreed he was a feeble brained old centrist who needed to gtfo the way. Living rent free etc.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The damage he allowed to happen doesn't magically disappear once he left office

[–] [email protected] 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The damage they've all allowed going back decades. He's bought and paid for just like every other pol. None of them are on our side and shouldn't be treated like they are.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

the narrative during the 2020 election about biden on this issue was that the was the most progressive president we've ever had. american voters are proned to against accepting the reality of what you just wrote because of narratives like this and there will be no alternative narrative if we don't keep reminding each other of this action and its direct impact on this issue.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 21 hours ago

I agree with that, we have slightly differing opinions but I feel like ultimately we're on the same page, have a great day comrade.